Re: console-apt

To: debian-powerpc@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: console-apt
From: Josh Huber <huberj@WPI.EDU>
Date: Tue, 14 Sep 1999 15:35:07 -0400 (EDT)
Message-id: <[🔎] 14302.41835.265927.680071@cpu.wpi.edu>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 19990914143927.A11137@them.org>
References: <[🔎] gb-81D6A2.19514903091999@goggle.westfalen.de> <[🔎] 19990914111053.B28965@cx258813-a.chnd1.az.home.com> <[🔎] 19990914143927.A11137@them.org>

Daniel Jacobowitz writes:
> Chris, any thoughts on a non-experimental upload of binutils in the
> near future?  Powerpc is somewhat broken at present.
Yes, speaking of which, emacs20 is still broken at the moment, because of a dependancy on liblockfile0, and liblockfile1 is the version that appears to be available...

as a side note, emacs20 does work fine when installed with dpkg --force-depends, but then apt-get complains that the dependancies are broken, and won't let me install any other packages unless it removes emacs first -- very annoying.

Can anyone suggest a fix?

Josh

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Re: console-apt
  - From: David Welton <davidw@master.debian.org>

References:
- console-apt
  - From: Georg Bauer <gb@hugo.westfalen.de>
- Re: console-apt
  - From: Matt Porter <mmporter@home.com>
- Re: console-apt
  - From: Daniel Jacobowitz <dan@debian.org>

Prev by Date: Re: Linux Hacker Meeting (formerly m68k Hacker Meeting)
Next by Date: Re: Linux Hacker Meeting (formerly m68k Hacker Meeting)
Previous by thread: Re: console-apt
Next by thread: Re: console-apt
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread