Re: gcc-2.95.1?
On Mon, Sep 06, 1999 at 05:06:32PM -0400, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
> The not-building he was referring to was from the debian source
> package, which still has six or so patches to the source, even after
> some were applied upstream.
>
> And the binutils hack is not a good idea; I'm not the person to ask why
> not, though.
>
>From the gcc changelog, it looks like Cort may be the one to ask:
Mon May 31 09:36:11 1999 Cort Dougan <cort@cs.nmt.edu>
* rs6000/linux.h (LINK_SPEC): Use emulation elf32ppclinux.
Greg
--
Greg Johnson gjohnson@physics.clarku.edu
http://physics.clarku.edu/~gjohnson finger for PGP key
Reply to: