[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

[Popcon-developers] popcon & derivatives



On Sat, May 18, 2013 at 08:01:20PM +0800, Paul Wise wrote:
> On Fri, May 17, 2013 at 5:23 PM, Bill Allombert wrote:
> 
> > In which scenario the vendor field is not defined ?
> 
> Where the submitter is running a version of popcon that doesn't send a
> vendor field.

In that case, it is best to assume the report come from Debian

> Where the submitter has a broken dpkg origins file, either because
> they broke it or because their derivative did.

In that case, it is better to report that the Vendor is broken.
I fixed that in change fe4af51f447 in the branch.

Thanks for your review,
-- 
Bill. <ballombe at debian.org>

Imagine a large red swirl here. 



Reply to: