[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

[Popcon-developers] Bug#414865: Required changes in deborphan done, how to proceed? (Was: Bug#414865: popularity-contest: A script to filter requested/recommended/suggested packages)



On Wed, May 13, 2009 at 10:51:41PM +0200, Carsten Hey wrote:
> On Wed, May 13, 2009 at 03:53:51PM +0200, Carsten Hey wrote:
> > On Wed, May 13, 2009 at 10:10:17AM +0200, Christophe Lohr wrote:
> > > Please find in attachment a first draft of such a wrapper. Is it what
> > > you mean?
> >
> > Yes, this looks good.  I would prefer to pass all option except possible
> > popcon-nodependency ones to orphaner an let orphaner handle the rest,
> > this would minimize future changes in popcon-nodependency, but there is
> > no need to adapt this before the rest of the script is finished.  Before
> > calling orphaner can be added I need to add the required options to
> > deborphan.
> 
> I think it's time to think about how this feature should be implemented.
> Christophe already provided a wrapper script missing the parts where he
> needed to wait for me.  He could finish it now if requested.
> 
> Do you, popcon maintainers, prefer to add such a wrapper (not a fork as
> originally planned by Christophe) around orphaner to your package or
> should I try to merge his work into orphaner?  As already said, I'd be
> happy with both.

I think I would prefer if you include it in orphaner.

Cheers,
-- 
Bill. <ballombe at debian.org>

Imagine a large red swirl here. 





Reply to: