[Popcon-developers] Bug#350002: marked as done (popularity-contest: Long RECENT-CTIME range?)
Your message dated Thu, 26 Jan 2006 19:23:41 +0100
with message-id <1138299822.2588.1.camel@localhost.localdomain>
and subject line Bug#350002: popularity-contest: Long RECENT-CTIME range?
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 26 Jan 2006 14:40:40 +0000
>From bice77@malmo2.net Thu Jan 26 06:40:40 2006
Return-path: <bice77@malmo2.net>
Received: from smtp.bredband2.net ([82.209.166.4])
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50)
id 1F28Ii-0005er-5k
for submit@bugs.debian.org; Thu, 26 Jan 2006 06:40:40 -0800
Received: (qmail 25389 invoked from network); 26 Jan 2006 14:41:55 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO localhost.localdomain) ([82.209.159.176])
(envelope-sender <bice77@malmo2.net>)
by smtp.bredband2.net (qmail-ldap-1.03) with SMTP
for <submit@bugs.debian.org>; 26 Jan 2006 14:41:55 -0000
Received: from vincent by localhost.localdomain with local (Exim 4.60)
(envelope-from <bice77@malmo2.net>)
id 1F28Ie-0001Bn-7N; Thu, 26 Jan 2006 15:40:36 +0100
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: =?utf-8?q?Vincent_L=C3=B6nngren?= <bice77@malmo2.net>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <submit@bugs.debian.org>
Subject: popularity-contest: Long RECENT-CTIME range?
Message-ID: <[🔎] 20060126144035.4438.39853.reportbug@localhost.localdomain>
X-Mailer: reportbug 3.18
Date: Thu, 26 Jan 2006 15:40:35 +0100
Delivered-To: submit@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.8 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,FROM_ENDS_IN_NUMS,
HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
Package: popularity-contest
Version: 1.32
Severity: normal
On my system, everything is considered to have a RECENT-CTIME. It's a pretty new system, but looking at /bin/ls it as a ctime of
2005-09-04 and an atime of 2006-01-26, and yet it is tagged RECENT-CTIME. If that is actually considered a recent ctime, then I
apologize, but if it's not then this is some kind of bug.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
APT prefers testing
APT policy: (500, 'testing')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.12
Locale: LANG=sv_SE.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=sv_SE.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Versions of packages popularity-contest depends on:
ii debconf [debconf-2.0] 1.4.67 Debian configuration management sy
ii dpkg 1.13.11.0.1 package maintenance system for Deb
Versions of packages popularity-contest recommends:
ii cron 3.0pl1-92 management of regular background p
ii exim4 4.60-1 metapackage to ease exim MTA (v4)
ii exim4-daemon-light [mail-tran 4.60-1 lightweight exim MTA (v4) daemon
ii mime-construct 1.9 construct/send MIME messages from
-- debconf information:
popularity-contest/hostid-failed:
* popularity-contest/participate: true
* popularity-contest/use-http: true
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 350002-done) by bugs.debian.org; 26 Jan 2006 18:23:45 +0000
>From bice77@malmo2.net Thu Jan 26 10:23:45 2006
Return-path: <bice77@malmo2.net>
Received: from smtp.bredband2.net ([82.209.166.4])
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50)
id 1F2Bmb-0003pr-7f
for 350002-done@bugs.debian.org; Thu, 26 Jan 2006 10:23:45 -0800
Received: (qmail 15060 invoked from network); 26 Jan 2006 18:22:57 -0000
Received: from mkb-176-159-209-82.3.cust.bredband2.com (HELO localhost.localdomain) ([82.209.159.176])
(envelope-sender <bice77@malmo2.net>)
by smtp.bredband2.net (qmail-ldap-1.03) with SMTP
for <350002-done@bugs.debian.org>; 26 Jan 2006 18:22:57 -0000
Received: from vincent by localhost.localdomain with local (Exim 4.60)
(envelope-from <bice77@malmo2.net>)
id 1F2BmY-0000gw-E5
for 350002-done@bugs.debian.org; Thu, 26 Jan 2006 19:23:42 +0100
Subject: Re: Bug#350002: popularity-contest: Long RECENT-CTIME range?
From: Vincent =?ISO-8859-1?Q?L=F6nngren?= <bice77@malmo2.net>
To: 350002-done@bugs.debian.org
In-Reply-To: <[🔎] 20060126150648.GB23027@pari.math.u-bordeaux.fr>
References: <[🔎] 20060126144035.4438.39853.reportbug@localhost.localdomain>
<[🔎] 20060126150648.GB23027@pari.math.u-bordeaux.fr>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Date: Thu, 26 Jan 2006 19:23:41 +0100
Message-Id: <1138299822.2588.1.camel@localhost.localdomain>
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Evolution 2.2.3
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-4.8 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,FROM_ENDS_IN_NUMS,
HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
tor 2006-01-26 klockan 16:06 +0100 skrev Bill Allombert:
> Hello Vincent,
>=20
> Are you sure 2005-09-04 is the ctime and not the mtime ? =20
> If your system is new, why /bin/ls was created 3 month ago ?
> To be sure, could you report the output of 'stat /bin/ls' ?
>=20
> If your system is new, it is actually normal you get all your packages
> tagged RECENT-CTIME.
The system is from around that time. I consider it pretty new.
Anyway, you were right - I've been looking at mtime, and the reason it's
all RECENT-CTIME - it wasn't before - is because I've been playing
around with chattr, and I seem to have changed ctime of all files
under /usr somehow.
Sorry to bother you.
--=20
Vincent L=F6nngren <bice77@malmo2.net>
Reply to: