[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

[Popcon-developers] Bug#229288: marked as done (uses high priority debconf question for trivial matter)



Your message dated Mon, 26 Jan 2004 16:18:05 -0500
with message-id <E1AlE7R-0007uM-00@auric.debian.org>
and subject line Bug#229111: fixed in popularity-contest 1.10
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 24 Jan 2004 05:56:39 +0000
>From hosehead@pisces.woot.net Fri Jan 23 21:56:39 2004
Return-path: <hosehead@pisces.woot.net>
Received: from cpe0006259cb0db-cm023469905389.cpe.net.cable.rogers.com (pisces.woot.net) [24.100.74.155] 
	by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
	id 1AkGmd-0008Eb-00; Fri, 23 Jan 2004 21:56:39 -0800
Received: by pisces.woot.net (Postfix, from userid 1000)
	id 60BB3FEACA; Sat, 24 Jan 2004 00:56:15 -0500 (EST)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Joe Drew <drew@debian.org>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <submit@bugs.debian.org>
Subject: uses high priority debconf question for trivial matter
X-Mailer: reportbug 2.39
Date: Sat, 24 Jan 2004 00:56:15 -0500
Message-Id: <[🔎] 20040124055615.60BB3FEACA@pisces.woot.net>
Delivered-To: submit@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_01_20 
	(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.0 required=4.0 tests=HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no 
	version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_01_20
X-Spam-Level: 

Package: popularity-contest
Version: 1.9
Severity: important

>From popularity-contest.config:
# Ask if the old addresses should be changed to the new address.
if [ "$MAILTO" = "erich-survey@debian.org" -o \
     "$MAILTO" = "apenwarr-survey@debian.org" ]; then
    db_input high popularity-contest/update-mailto || [ $? -eq 30 ]
    db_go || true
fi

This absolutely should not be a high priority question. In my opinion, it
should not be a question at all; the postinst should have automatically
changed the mailto reference, and only prompted if something went wrong.

>From debconf(7):
    low    Very trivial questions that have defaults that will work in 
           the vast majority of cases.
    medium Normal questions that have reasonable defaults.
    high   Questions that don't have a reasonable default.
    critical
           Questions that you really, really need to see (or else).

In my opinion, this fits into 'low' if at all (who cares, anyways, and what
are the ramifications if it's not done?); high is most certainly priority
inflation.

My suggestion: remove the prompt.

-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
Architecture: i386
Kernel: Linux pisces 2.4.22 #4 Fri Sep 5 21:44:11 EDT 2003 i686
Locale: LANG=en_US, LC_CTYPE=en_US

Versions of packages popularity-contest depends on:
ii  debconf                       1.4.7      Debian configuration management sy
ii  dpkg                          1.10.18    Package maintenance system for Deb
ii  perl                          5.8.2-2    Larry Wall's Practical Extraction 
ii  postfix [mail-transport-agent 2.0.18-1   A high-performance mail transport 

-- debconf information:
* popularity-contest/participate: true
* popularity-contest/intro: 
* popularity-contest/update-mailto: true


---------------------------------------
Received: (at 229111-close) by bugs.debian.org; 26 Jan 2004 21:21:31 +0000
>From katie@auric.debian.org Mon Jan 26 13:21:31 2004
Return-path: <katie@auric.debian.org>
Received: from auric.debian.org [206.246.226.45] (mail)
	by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
	id 1AlEAl-0007eL-00; Mon, 26 Jan 2004 13:21:31 -0800
Received: from katie by auric.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
	id 1AlE7R-0007uM-00; Mon, 26 Jan 2004 16:18:05 -0500
From: Petter Reinholdtsen <pere@debian.org>
To: 229111-close@bugs.debian.org
X-Katie: $Revision: 1.43 $
Subject: Bug#229111: fixed in popularity-contest 1.10
Message-Id: <E1AlE7R-0007uM-00@auric.debian.org>
Sender: Archive Administrator <katie@auric.debian.org>
Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2004 16:18:05 -0500
Delivered-To: 229111-close@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_01_25 
	(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.0 required=4.0 tests=HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no 
	version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_01_25
X-Spam-Level: 

Source: popularity-contest
Source-Version: 1.10

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
popularity-contest, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

popularity-contest_1.10.dsc
  to pool/main/p/popularity-contest/popularity-contest_1.10.dsc
popularity-contest_1.10.tar.gz
  to pool/main/p/popularity-contest/popularity-contest_1.10.tar.gz
popularity-contest_1.10_all.deb
  to pool/main/p/popularity-contest/popularity-contest_1.10_all.deb



A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to 229111@bugs.debian.org,
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Petter Reinholdtsen <pere@debian.org> (supplier of updated popularity-contest package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing ftpmaster@debian.org)


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Format: 1.7
Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2004 22:05:41 +0100
Source: popularity-contest
Binary: popularity-contest
Architecture: source all
Version: 1.10
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Popularity Contest Developers <popcon-developers@lists.alioth.debian.org>
Changed-By: Petter Reinholdtsen <pere@debian.org>
Description: 
 popularity-contest - Vote for your favourite packages automatically
Closes: 229111 229288 229538 229573
Changes: 
 popularity-contest (1.10) unstable; urgency=low
 .
   * Petter Reinholdtsen
     - Added Japanese debconf translation thanks to Kenshi
       Muto. (Closes: #229538)
     - Make sure /etc/popularity-contest.conf is readable by user
       nobody, no matter the umask of root.
     - Drop the intro note, and show the explanation as part of the
       participate question. (Closes: #229573)
     - Update Norwegian BokmÃ?Â¥l debconf translation.
     - Remove the question asking if it is ok to edit MAILTO address,
       and move the default values into
       /usr/share/popularity-contest/default.conf. (Closes: #229288, #229111)
     - Change to use dh_perl -d' to only depend on the base perl packages.
   * Bill Allombert
     - Update server-side scripts to current popcon.debian.org version.
Files: 
 9c583546747e9dd3aaf058f12ec57c8c 735 misc optional popularity-contest_1.10.dsc
 f28b006e227f900cbe502b71b9015c3c 23830 misc optional popularity-contest_1.10.tar.gz
 38101bcb74d3b3970af67f3990e75a17 18742 misc optional popularity-contest_1.10_all.deb

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org

iD8DBQFAFYFU20zMSyow1ykRArVzAJ9GnEurJm1YLXJ8nt5r2qOM5bmDSACfaZC3
VYaS/cW7+qMR8RVhbqW+yNg=
=5KYO
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----




Reply to: