Bug#891216: Requre d-devel consultation for epoch bump [and 2 more messages]

[Ian Jackson <ijackson@chiark.greenend.org.uk>]

Sean Whitton writes ("Re: Bug#891216: Requre d-devel consultation for epoch bump [and 2 more messages]"):
> On Fri, May 25 2018, Ian Jackson wrote:
> > When we get to tidying this up, the epoch-ignoring new file name
> > uniqueness section could probably do with a cross-reference.
> 
> Do you mean 3.2.2?

I think I do.  "Uniqueness of version numbers".

> I'm mildly distressed that we have two patches that I am hoping to get
> into the next release of Policy that add subsubsubsections (i.e. the
> section number contains three periods) but I think it's the right thing
> to do in both cases.

I did various git-grep to find out what rst syntax I should use for my
subsubsection and discovered that there were quite a few already, all
using ^^^^^.

I don't think there is anything wrong with subsubsections.  They ease
all of reading, navigation, cross-referencing, and referencing from
elsewhere.

Regards,
Ian.

-- 
Ian Jackson <ijackson@chiark.greenend.org.uk>   These opinions are my own.

If I emailed you from an address @fyvzl.net or @evade.org.uk, that is
a private address which bypasses my fierce spamfilter.