[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#754876: Virtual packages for the new Java runtimes



On 07/16/2014 02:44 AM, Bill Allombert wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 15, 2014 at 09:39:33PM -0700, tony mancill wrote:
>> On 07/15/2014 11:30 AM, Bill Allombert wrote:
>>> On Tue, Jul 15, 2014 at 04:57:18PM +0200, Emmanuel Bourg wrote:
>>>> Le 15/07/2014 16:22, Bill Allombert a écrit :
>>>>
>>>>> Could you please write the definition for each of them, and determine whether
>>>>> java1-runtime and java2-runtime should be kept ?
[snip]
>> I have a preference for "non-graphical" over "non graphical" in the
>> description of the -headless variants, but it appears that both usages
>> are common.
> 
> OK, so I offer the following patch. Is it fine ?

Yes, the patch looks good to me.  Thank you for managing the update.

Cheers,
tony


Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


Reply to: