On Thu, Jul 03, 2014 at 07:24:51PM +0200, Bill Allombert wrote: > On Thu, Jul 03, 2014 at 11:52:23AM -0400, Paul Tagliamonte wrote: > > I don't see a systemd-must-die package (conflicting with a core part of > > the Distro) as being productive, helpful or necessary. I definitely > > don't see it as there for the right reason. > > This is not for policy to decide that. > > > If this case isn't special enough to be in policy (which may be fair, > > given harden-*), we can get a specific ruling on it with another team. > > Please do not use the policy process to justify a decision you are already > commited to. Please don't assume bad faith. This was me filing the bug on my own, not on behalf of the ftp-team. I think there's enough jurisdiction to do this ftpteam side, but I wanted to clarify what I thought was a grey area. > This is not conducive to good faith discussions. > The end does not justify the mean. I'd thank you to not assume bad faith. > Cheers, > -- > Bill. <ballombe@debian.org> > > Imagine a large red swirl here. Paul -- .''`. Paul Tagliamonte <paultag@debian.org> | Proud Debian Developer : :' : 4096R / 8F04 9AD8 2C92 066C 7352 D28A 7B58 5B30 807C 2A87 `. `'` http://people.debian.org/~paultag `- http://people.debian.org/~paultag/conduct-statement.txt
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature