Bug#509933: versioning SONAMEs of shared libraries is not clearly recommended
On Mon, 12 Jul 2010, Russ Allbery wrote:
> Russ Allbery <email@example.com> writes:
> > There was a lot of background information missing from Policy, which in
> > my opinion made it unnecessarily difficult to understand the motivation
> > and implications of the various Policy requirements. Here's a first
> > draft of a patch to add much more information about how shared libraries
> > work, better motivate the requirements already present (and tighten some
> > of the language), and add a should-level requirement to change the
> > SONAME if the library ABI changes.
> > Objections, sections, or other review?
> Here's an updated version of this patch taking into account the various
> review and wording suggestions.
Seconded with the small typo fix below:
> + The <tt>SONAME</tt> and binary package name need not, and indeed
> + normally should not, change if new interfaces are added but none
> + are removed or changed, since this will not break binaries
> + linked against the old shared library. Correct versioning of
> + dependencies on the newer shared library by binaries that use
> + the new interfaces is handled via
> + the <qref id="sharedlibs-shlibdeps"><tt>shilbs</tt>
> + system</qref> or via symbols files (see
> + <manref name="deb-symbols" section="5">).
> + </p>
Follow the Debian Revolution ▶ http://RaphaelHertzog.com (English)
▶ http://RaphaelHertzog.fr (Français)