Bug#484656: Fw: gnome, kde, xfce use non-policy main menu
Begin forwarded message:
Date: Sun, 6 Jul 2008 13:08:40 -0400
From: Joey Hess <joeyh@debian.org>
To: debian-policy@lists.debian.org, debian-devel@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: gnome, kde, xfce use non-policy main menu
Josselin Mouette wrote:
> Therefore, I still feel that, despite it being a big mess, the current
> situation is the best:
> * the default menu contains only what is needed, and we are
> still hunting down entries that are useless to make them not show up
> by default;
> * users wanting the Debian menu and its gazillions of entries
> including window managers, terminal emulators and shell
> interpreters can enable it easily in the menu editor;
> * those really wanting only the Debian menu can replace
> gnome-applications.menu by debian-menu.menu.
>
> If you want this to change, you need to seriously think about
> evolutions to both XDG and Debian menu systems, to convince fd.o and
> the Debian menu maintainer to implement them
Actually, no, if you want this to change, you have only to do nothing.
People (many of them MOTUs from Ubuntu in my experience) are filing
lots of requestes for random packages to have .desktop files added to
them, so they appear in the gnome menu. The criteria seems to be "a
program that $RANDOM_USER would like to have on the menu and files a
bug about || that $RANDOM_UPSTREAM ships a desktop file for, for
whatever reason".
So, after sufficient time, the gnome menu will contain a random
assortment of the menu items that also appear in the debian menu. Not a
well-chosen and consistent assortment, but the kind of random assortment
that you get when you ignore policy and go off on your own way.
--
see shy jo
--
And that's my crabbing done for the day. Got it out of the way early,
now I have the rest of the afternoon to sniff fragrant tea-roses or
strangle cute bunnies or something. -- Michael Devore
GnuPG Key Fingerprint 86 F5 81 A5 D4 2E 1F 1C http://gnupg.org
No more sea shells: Daniel's Weblog http://cshore.wordpress.com
Reply to: