Bug#87510: I second this proposal
On Fri, May 18, 2001 at 11:08:01PM +0200, Peter Palfrader wrote:
> > The other is that it's completely wrongheaded
> > to convert a policy from being entirely optional (you /may/ declare
> > build-depends) straight to being compulsory.
> Section 2.4.2 says /should/:
Yes, policy is currently riddled with such inconsistencies. It's a
significant bug that needs sorting out over the next 3-6 months. I
have a gameplan, but am not yet ready to work on it.
Julian Gilbey, Dept of Maths, Queen Mary, Univ. of London
Debian GNU/Linux Developer, see http://people.debian.org/~jdg
Donate free food to the world's hungry: see http://www.thehungersite.com/