[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#87510: I second this proposal

On Fri, May 18, 2001 at 11:08:01PM +0200, Peter Palfrader wrote:
> >                      The other is that it's completely wrongheaded
> > to convert a policy from being entirely optional (you /may/ declare
> > build-depends) straight to being compulsory.
> Section 2.4.2 says /should/:

Yes, policy is currently riddled with such inconsistencies.  It's a
significant bug that needs sorting out over the next 3-6 months.  I
have a gameplan, but am not yet ready to work on it.



         Julian Gilbey, Dept of Maths, Queen Mary, Univ. of London
       Debian GNU/Linux Developer,  see http://people.debian.org/~jdg
  Donate free food to the world's hungry: see http://www.thehungersite.com/

Reply to: