[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#87510: I second this proposal



On Fri, May 18, 2001 at 07:49:04AM +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> <--  snip  -->
> 
> Policy should now require packages to specify build time dependencies
> (i.e., packages which require ... MUST specify...)
> 
> Build time dependencies have been in policy for 18 months already.
> 
> <--  snip  -->

I agree with Anthony: this is not yet appropriate.  At a later stage
when we distinguish "MUST" in the RFC sense and "MUST(*)" = "MUST and
RC if you fail to do this", then Build-Depends can become a plain
MUST.  But I'm not ready to do this yet (time constraints).

   Julian

-- 
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-

         Julian Gilbey, Dept of Maths, Queen Mary, Univ. of London
       Debian GNU/Linux Developer,  see http://people.debian.org/~jdg
  Donate free food to the world's hungry: see http://www.thehungersite.com/



Reply to: