Re: Bug#91257: re-proposing this
On Sun, May 06, 2001 at 04:47:07PM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote:
> (Later being after we work out a satisfactory way of specifying what "must"
> is meant to specify. Julian, I'd really appreciate it if you could propose
> something along those lines. But not in this thread...)
My current order of priorities:
(1) Finish entering my textual improvements into CVS
(2) Make some progress on cleaning up the Policy bugs list (which is
ever growing)
In the meantime, I think Manoj is planning to convert policy to
Docbook XML format.
(3) Rewrite policy so that it's more comprehensible: its ordering
(merger of policy + packaging) is really hard work.
When I'm doing (3), I will make the changes to MUST and SHOULD which
I've suggested, and will present it to this list for ratification. If
the whole shebang is approved, then it can go in. But I don't want to
put in the effort to make the changes at this point.
Julian
--
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Julian Gilbey, Dept of Maths, Queen Mary, Univ. of London
Debian GNU/Linux Developer, see http://people.debian.org/~jdg
Donate free food to the world's hungry: see http://www.thehungersite.com/
Reply to: