[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#92423: [PROPOSAL] renaming of debian/rules file

Package: debian-policy
Severity: wishlist

It is about time we recognize the truth. We have been constantly called as
the most elitist of the GNU/Linux distribuitons, and this is true.

So, I propose we make clear that we are indeed '1337 and rename the
debian/rules file to debian/rulez.  Anyone who cannot see the benefits of
the added c00lness effect such a change would bring is not fit to be One Of

The transition from the old to the new system can be easily performed by
including a test in dpkg-source, so that a debian/rules -> debian/rulez
symlink is added to the source deb if the debian/rules file is not present
and the debian/rulez file is.  It should also automatically call the
atention of any lamerz that try to build a package without renaming the
rules file to rulez.

I also propose we add the following target to the standard debian/rulez
target list:

m00:  should display an ASCII-art of a stoned cow, in deference of the s1kr3t
      bovine powers behind the Debian packaging system, and the magic smoke of
      Holy Cow that is portrayed in our logo.

-- System Information
Debian Release: testing/unstable
Architecture: i386
Kernel: Linux godzillah.rivendell.sol 2.2.19 #1 Thu Mar 29 19:31:38 BRT 2001 i586

Versions of packages debian-policy depends on:
ii  fileutils                     4.0.43-1   GNU file management utilities.    

PS: If you took this email seriously, hit your head with a hammer and think
again. It was sent in the April fools day, after all. If you second this,
you're seriously deranged, and in severe need of either more coffee, or sleep.

  "One disk to rule them all, One disk to find them. One disk to bring
  them all and in the darkness grind them. In the Land of Redmond
  where the shadows lie." -- The Silicon Valley Tarot
  Henrique Holschuh

Reply to: