On Tue, 17 Oct 2000, Roland Rosenfeld wrote: > daemon is running yet, but we should introduce one and fixate this in > the policy). I'm on it. The code is ready and tested (for rc?.d, but I'll code the file-rc version if the thing is accepted -- and it WAS designed to work with whatever rc scheme you come up with, as long as it registers a init.d interface). Real life is interfering a bit right now, but I'll send a policy proposal, along with the required code, to -devel/-policy soon. I've sent an earlier version of this stuff (including code) to -devel sometime ago, so it's not vapourware :-) > IMHO libc should handle its various incompatibilies itself, because > its a problem in libc, not in the daemon packages. Or request the packages to provide a file in some /usr/lib directory with the name of the init.d scripts to be sent a restart for that package (or, if one abhors that idea too much, to call a libc6-provided script in postinst and postrm). Asking a package to add a certain file isn't too much, and it is less intrusive and less ugly than screwing up with user-visible interfaces such as a init.d script IMHO. -- "One disk to rule them all, One disk to find them. One disk to bring them all and in the darkness grind them. In the Land of Redmond where the shadows lie." -- The Silicon Valley Tarot Henrique Holschuh
Attachment:
pgp7YYOixHATB.pgp
Description: PGP signature