[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: lintian tag team/pkg-perl/testsuite/no-team-tests



On Mon, 07 Dec 2020 17:01:05 +0200, Andrius Merkys wrote:

> >> I am working on a package already having pkg-perl autopkgtest suite, and
> >> with 'Testsuite: autopkgtest-pkg-perl' in d/control. I want to add a
> >> regular autopkgtest in addition to already existing pkg-perl suite. 
> > Out of curiosity: Why? [0]
> The package in question (libjson-validator-perl) is to provide symlinks
> to files in another binary package (openapi-specification) [1]. With
> this autopkgtest I want to make sure the symlinks are not broken by
> changes in openapi-specification.

Ah, right, I also just saw your commit.
An additional test seems useful indeed.
 
> > But maybe lintian could be improved, I never really looked into the
> > details of this combination.
> By looking into lintian code [2], it seems that the code expects
> 'Testsuite' to contain a single entry, not comma-separated entries. I
> will file an issue on lintian.

https://salsa.debian.org/ci-team/autopkgtest/raw/master/doc/README.package-tests.rst
says:

  Source package header
  ---------------------

  To allow test execution environments to discover packages which provide
  tests, their source packages need to have a ``Testsuite:`` header
  containing ``autopkgtest`` (or a value like ``autopkgtest-pkg-perl``,
  see below).  Multiple values get comma separated, as usual in control
  files.  This tag is added automatically by dpkg-source version 1.17.11
  or later, so normally you don't need to worry about this field.

so it looks like more than one values are indeed allowed.


Cheers,
gregor

-- 
 .''`.  https://info.comodo.priv.at -- Debian Developer https://www.debian.org
 : :' : OpenPGP fingerprint D1E1 316E 93A7 60A8 104D  85FA BB3A 6801 8649 AA06
 `. `'  Member VIBE!AT & SPI Inc. -- Supporter Free Software Foundation Europe
   `-   NP: Neil Young: There's A World

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital Signature


Reply to: