[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: libtest-fitesque new package review

Had a chance to revisit this package, and the new run against the licence file worked correctly.

licensecheck ./LICENSE
./LICENSE: BSD 3-clause "New" or "Revised" License

So I will not be raising a bug at this time.
Ken Ibbotson
E: keni@computer.org

"Reality is merely an illusion, albeit a very persistent one."
    - Albert Einstein (1879-1955)

On Mon, 26 Oct 2020 at 00:32, Jonas Smedegaard <jonas@jones.dk> wrote:
Quoting Ken Ibbotson (2020-10-24 03:47:31)
> Also, at the completion of 'dh-make-perl', an information message in
> the copyright file indicates: 'License: unparsable',
> Does 'dh-make-perl' look for licence by name or text, and ergo would this
> constitute a reason bug to log that the licence was not recognised?

Speaking as author of the licensecheck tool, I would find it helpful to
have a bugreport filed against licensecheck for licensing statements
unrecognized by that tool.

 - Jonas

 * Jonas Smedegaard - idealist & Internet-arkitekt
 * Tlf.: +45 40843136  Website: http://dr.jones.dk/

 [x] quote me freely  [ ] ask before reusing  [ ] keep private

Reply to: