Re: libtest-fitesque new package review
Had a chance to revisit this package, and the new run against the licence file worked correctly.
./LICENSE: BSD 3-clause "New" or "Revised" License
So I will not be raising a bug at this time.
"Reality is merely an illusion, albeit a very persistent one."
- Albert Einstein (1879-1955)
On Mon, 26 Oct 2020 at 00:32, Jonas Smedegaard <email@example.com
Quoting Ken Ibbotson (2020-10-24 03:47:31)
> Also, at the completion of 'dh-make-perl', an information message in
> the copyright file indicates: 'License: unparsable',
> Does 'dh-make-perl' look for licence by name or text, and ergo would this
> constitute a reason bug to log that the licence was not recognised?
Speaking as author of the licensecheck tool, I would find it helpful to
have a bugreport filed against licensecheck for licensing statements
unrecognized by that tool.
* Jonas Smedegaard - idealist & Internet-arkitekt
* Tlf.: +45 40843136 Website: http://dr.jones.dk/
[x] quote me freely [ ] ask before reusing [ ] keep private