On Mon, 15 Sep 2014 12:20:29 +0200, Martin Pitt wrote: > gregor herrmann [2014-09-13 21:20 +0200]: > > Right, adding "Testsuite: autopkgtest-auto-perl" (or however it will > > be called) sounds like a nice option to say "run the default pkg-perl > > tests" without having to maintain d/t/control files (or inventing the > > include syntax). > It seems we pretty much have consensus about this, and Guillem also > agreed to this on my blog post [1]. With that we can even drop the > autodetection logic at some point, and then everything will be > explicit again. Right, sounds like a perfect plan. > The naming is bikeshedding, so I went ahead with the proposed > "autopkgtest-$team" schema: > http://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/autopkgtest/autopkgtest.git/commit/?id=73a59952e Excellent, thanks! > > The only downside might be that it leaves the burden of maintaining > > the test definition to the autopkgtest maintainers on our request; > > but if that's ok for you guys, I'm fine with it as well :) > If/once we move to autodep8 as a separate project, it'll be > collab-maint, and every team can adjust their own tests. Ah, nice. > But even if > it stays in autopkgtest, I'm happy to update the templates. With the > pkg-perl-autopkgtest indirection in between it'll be very low effort, > and even if we cut this out and fold the real commands into the > template it won't change that often after the initial settling. Send > git formatted patches ;-) Will do, in case it's necessary :) Cheers, gregor -- .''`. Homepage: http://info.comodo.priv.at/ - OpenPGP key 0xBB3A68018649AA06 : :' : Debian GNU/Linux user, admin, and developer - http://www.debian.org/ `. `' Member of VIBE!AT & SPI, fellow of the Free Software Foundation Europe `- NP: Funny Van Dannen: Jan Ulrich
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital Signature