Re: require advice to patch (or not) a package
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256
Le 11/3/11 5:58 PM, gregor herrmann a écrit :
> On Thu, 03 Nov 2011 09:53:33 +0100, Olivier Sallou wrote:
>
>> There are several cases:
>> - missing description in =head1 NAME
>>
>> - dual =head1 NAME, one with description, one with no description.
>>
>> It hits more than 200 files....
>
> Hm, this is really a mess.
> And dropping manpages seems only viable for some of them.
>
> But after I had the suspicion that this is not handwritten, I
> discovered something interesting: maint/bin/update_dbic_dump.pl which
> seems to create (at least parts of) the modules/POD.
>
> Especially generate_chado_submodule_pod and
> _generate_chado_submodule_podfile look interesting, and there's
> something about comments that are turned into whatis entries. And
> they seem to come from %module_descriptions which seems to get filled
> by some parsing of some (upstream chado) xml file, probably
> https://gmod.svn.sourceforge.net/svnroot/gmod/schema/trunk/chado/chado-module-metadata.xml
>
> Phew.
>
> Hm, not sure about the best way to proceed. Either someone digs
> closer into this script or comesout with a fixit script, or upstream
> can be bothered to improve the situation ...
>
I gonna ask upstream author about this, maybe he could fix this....
>
> Cheers,
> gregor
>
- --
Olivier Sallou
IRISA / University of Rennes 1
Campus de Beaulieu, 35000 RENNES - FRANCE
Tel: 02.99.84.71.95
gpg key id: 4096R/326D8438 (pgp.mit.edu)
Key fingerprint = 5FB4 6F83 D3B9 5204 6335 D26D 78DC 68DB 326D 8438
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (Darwin)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/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=IHvX
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Reply to: