Re: Intoroduction: pmcenery

To: Paul McEnery <pmcenery@gmail.com>
Cc: debian-perl@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: Intoroduction: pmcenery
From: Guy Hulbert <gwhulbert@eol.ca>
Date: Thu, 21 Jan 2010 05:57:40 -0500
Message-id: <1264071460.22628.98.camel@cray.cotef.org>
In-reply-to: <b4892f8e1001210142q3e1daf89u500e25a14abd5f8d@mail.gmail.com>
References: <b4892f8e1001200740y4e3cf1ferf3970b21940e3219@mail.gmail.com> <1264003242.22628.64.camel@cray.cotef.org> <b4892f8e1001200819x78e276a9r3d55296c2f3adda0@mail.gmail.com> <1264004599.22628.69.camel@cray.cotef.org> <b4892f8e1001210142q3e1daf89u500e25a14abd5f8d@mail.gmail.com>

On Thu, 2010-21-01 at 09:42 +0000, Paul McEnery wrote:
> Any thoughts as to why I should not go ahead and split the package?

No.  Splitting the package is standard practice.

-- 
--gh

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Intoroduction: pmcenery
  - From: Paul McEnery <pmcenery@gmail.com>

References:
- Intoroduction: pmcenery
  - From: Paul McEnery <pmcenery@gmail.com>
- Re: Intoroduction: pmcenery
  - From: Guy Hulbert <gwhulbert@eol.ca>
- Re: Intoroduction: pmcenery
  - From: Paul McEnery <pmcenery@gmail.com>
- Re: Intoroduction: pmcenery
  - From: Guy Hulbert <gwhulbert@eol.ca>
- Re: Intoroduction: pmcenery
  - From: Paul McEnery <pmcenery@gmail.com>

Prev by Date: Re: Intoroduction: pmcenery
Next by Date: Re: Perl (and other) packaging talk on FOSDEM
Previous by thread: Re: Intoroduction: pmcenery
Next by thread: Re: Intoroduction: pmcenery
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread