source package name restricted by policy? (Was: Bug#493308: ITP: libconfig-model...)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
[cc dropped - this is not specific to the bugreport]
On Sat, Aug 02, 2008 at 11:12:03AM +0300, Damyan Ivanov wrote:
>-=| Jonas Smedegaard, Sat, Aug 02, 2008 at 08:46:07AM +0200 |=-
>> On Sat, Aug 02, 2008 at 01:57:58AM +0200, gregor herrmann wrote:
>> >On Fri, 01 Aug 2008 19:36:37 -0400, Nicolas Valcarcel wrote:
>> >
>> >> Package name: libconfig-model
>> >
>> >The package should be named libconfig-model-perl; cf.
>> >http://www.debian.org/doc/packaging-manuals/perl-policy/ch-module_packages.html
>>
>> Do policy govern name of _source_ package too?
>
>I think, yes, unless there is a reason for the source package name to
>differ from the binary package name.
Do you personally *prefer* naming source package equal to main binary
package, or do you believe that Perl Policy *mandates* this?
Regards,
- Jonas
- --
* Jonas Smedegaard - idealist og Internet-arkitekt
* Tlf.: +45 40843136 Website: http://dr.jones.dk/
[x] quote me freely [ ] ask before reusing [ ] keep private
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)
iEYEARECAAYFAkicPVoACgkQn7DbMsAkQLh54ACfYwZQnndyE9NiREJ7xdoF8bYz
KR8AoIbzlsZVWSNTkYmIKluHv/42fLCx
=yZ0X
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Reply to: