Re: dh_perl
- To: Joey Hess <joeyh@debian.org>
- Cc: debian-perl@lists.debian.org
- Subject: Re: dh_perl
- From: Henrique de Moraes Holschuh <hmh@debian.org>
- Date: Sat, 1 Feb 2003 18:58:40 -0200
- Message-id: <20030201205840.GA4171@khazad-dum>
- In-reply-to: <20030201185553.GA11525@dragon.kitenet.net>
- References: <87fzr9hsos.fsf@whinlatter.uklinux.net> <20030131225510.GC19675@riva.ucam.org> <87isw440qs.fsf@whinlatter.uklinux.net> <20030201172048.GD6549@riva.ucam.org> <20030201185553.GA11525@dragon.kitenet.net>
On Sat, 01 Feb 2003, Joey Hess wrote:
> an up-to-date package database available. And to really do this right
> you probably need a layer of indirection with room for maintainer
> overrides as the shlibs files provide for automated shared library
> dependency calculation.
Is there a reason why we don't have something like a shlibs file for perl?
It *would* come in handy, and tools such as dh_perl could make use of it.
--
"One disk to rule them all, One disk to find them. One disk to bring
them all and in the darkness grind them. In the Land of Redmond
where the shadows lie." -- The Silicon Valley Tarot
Henrique Holschuh
Reply to: