Re: Perl 5.004 year 2000 compliant ? (Re: [whimsy@tkg.att.ne.jp: perl5.004?$B$N?(B 2000?$BG/LdBj$K4X$7$F?(B])

To: Fumitoshi UKAI <ukai@debian.or.jp>
Cc: debian-perl@lists.debian.org, treacy@debian.org, debian-www@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: Perl 5.004 year 2000 compliant ? (Re: [whimsy@tkg.att.ne.jp: perl5.004?$B$N?(B 2000?$BG/LdBj$K4X$7$F?(B])
From: Stephen Zander <gibreel@debian.org>
Date: 24 Nov 1999 18:23:35 -0800
Message-id: <[🔎] 877lj7wbq0.fsf@pooh.fire-swamp.net>
In-reply-to: Fumitoshi UKAI's message of "Thu, 25 Nov 1999 02:27:23 +0900"
References: <19991123111832.B18942@debian.org> <14394.49799.673654.20799S@lichee.ukai.org> <19991123230222.A26909@debian.org> <[🔎] 87n1s34x6s.wl@lichee.ukai.org>

>>>>> "Fumitoshi" == Fumitoshi UKAI <ukai@debian.or.jp> writes:
    Fumitoshi>  Does anyone know perl 5.004 is really year 2000
    Fumitoshi> compliant and tell me its information source, please?

The document to which you refer applies to *all* versions of perl.

-- 
Stephen

"Farcical aquatic ceremonies are no basis for a system of government!"

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Perl 5.004 year 2000 compliant ? (Re: [whimsy@tkg.att.ne.jp: perl5.004?$B$N?(B 2000?$BG/LdBj$K4X$7$F?(B])
  - From: rob@squeamish.ossifrage.net (Robert Collier)

References:
- Perl 5.004 year 2000 compliant ? (Re: [whimsy@tkg.att.ne.jp: perl5.004?$B$N?(B 2000?$BG/LdBj$K4X$7$F?(B])
  - From: Fumitoshi UKAI <ukai@debian.or.jp>

Prev by Date: Perl 5.004 year 2000 compliant ? (Re: [whimsy@tkg.att.ne.jp: perl5.004?$B$N?(B 2000?$BG/LdBj$K4X$7$F?(B])
Next by Date: Re: Perl 5.004 year 2000 compliant ? (Re: [whimsy@tkg.att.ne.jp: perl5.004?$B$N?(B 2000?$BG/LdBj$K4X$7$F?(B])
Previous by thread: Perl 5.004 year 2000 compliant ? (Re: [whimsy@tkg.att.ne.jp: perl5.004?$B$N?(B 2000?$BG/LdBj$K4X$7$F?(B])
Next by thread: Re: Perl 5.004 year 2000 compliant ? (Re: [whimsy@tkg.att.ne.jp: perl5.004?$B$N?(B 2000?$BG/LdBj$K4X$7$F?(B])
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread