Bug#1109286: libreoffice-kf6: Plasma/kf6 integration broken
Package: libreoffice-kf6
Version: 4:25.2.3-2
Severity: normal
Dear Maintainer,
*** Reporter, please consider answering these questions, where appropriate ***
Many thanks for the excellent libreoffice maintainance in Debian. I
did not try the versions from experimental, since I thought this issue
should be fixed in trixie and the version in experimental is likely not moving to trixie.
* What led up to the situation?
Probably an upgrade in testing.
* What exactly did you do (or not do) that was effective (or
ineffective)?
Just started libreoffice
* What was the outcome of this action?
Standard menus and file picker, not the KF6 versions.
* What outcome did you expect instead?
Proper plasma/kf6 integration.
I also tried running
SAL_USE_VCLPLUGIN=kf6 libreoffice
Also it would be good to update https://wiki.debian.org/LibreOffice for trixie.
*** End of the template - remove these template lines ***
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 13.0
APT prefers testing-security
APT policy: (500, 'testing-security'), (500, 'testing-debug'), (500, 'testing'), (90, 'unstable-debug'), (90, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Foreign Architectures: i386
Kernel: Linux 6.12.35+deb13-amd64 (SMP w/6 CPU threads; PREEMPT)
Locale: LANG=de_DE.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=de_DE.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8), LANGUAGE=de:en_US
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /usr/bin/dash
Init: systemd (via /run/systemd/system)
LSM: AppArmor: enabled
Versions of packages libreoffice-kf6 depends on:
ii kio6 6.13.0-6
ii libc6 2.41-9
ii libgcc-s1 14.2.0-19
ii libkf6configcore6 6.13.0-2
ii libkf6kiofilewidgets6 6.13.0-6
ii libqt6core6t64 6.8.2+dfsg-8
ii libqt6widgets6 6.8.2+dfsg-8
ii libreoffice-core 4:25.2.3-2
ii libreoffice-qt6 4:25.2.3-2
ii libstdc++6 14.2.0-19
ii libuno-cppu3t64 4:25.2.3-2
ii libuno-cppuhelpergcc3-3t64 4:25.2.3-2
ii libuno-sal3t64 4:25.2.3-2
ii uno-libs-private 4:25.2.3-2
Versions of packages libreoffice-kf6 recommends:
ii libreoffice-style-breeze 4:25.2.3-2
libreoffice-kf6 suggests no packages.
-- no debconf information
Reply to: