autopkgtest for libreoffice/1:7.0.2-4: arm64: Regression
Hello!
After the latest MariaDB 10.5.6-2 upload the LibreOffice debci started
failing in
https://ci.debian.net/data/autopkgtest/testing/arm64/libr/libreoffice/7761042/log.gz
Problem seems to be:
test_21_.uno:EditGlossary (openDialogs.openDialogs) ... autopkgtest
[09:25:17]: ERROR: timed out on command "su -s /bin/bash debci -c set
-e; export USER=`id -nu`; . /etc/profile >/dev/null 2>&1 || true; .
~/.profile >/dev/null 2>&1 || true;
buildtree="/tmp/autopkgtest-lxc.3ztn5450/downtmp/build.SEG/src"; mkdir
-p -m 1777 -- "/tmp/autopkgtest-lxc.3ztn5450/downtmp/uicheck-sw-artifacts";
export AUTOPKGTEST_ARTIFACTS="/tmp/autopkgtest-lxc.3ztn5450/downtmp/uicheck-sw-artifacts";
export ADT_ARTIFACTS="$AUTOPKGTEST_ARTIFACTS"; mkdir -p -m 755
"/tmp/autopkgtest-lxc.3ztn5450/downtmp/autopkgtest_tmp"; export
AUTOPKGTEST_TMP="/tmp/autopkgtest-lxc.3ztn5450/downtmp/autopkgtest_tmp";
export ADTTMP="$AUTOPKGTEST_TMP"; export
DEBIAN_FRONTEND=noninteractive; export LANG=C.UTF-8; export
DEB_BUILD_OPTIONS=parallel=4; unset LANGUAGE LC_CTYPE LC_NUMERIC
LC_TIME LC_COLLATE LC_MONETARY LC_MESSAGES LC_PAPER LC_NAME
LC_ADDRESS LC_TELEPHONE LC_MEASUREMENT LC_IDENTIFICATION LC_ALL;rm
-f /tmp/autopkgtest_script_pid; set -C; echo $$ >
/tmp/autopkgtest_script_pid; set +C; trap "rm -f
/tmp/autopkgtest_script_pid" EXIT INT QUIT PIPE; cd "$buildtree";
chmod +x /tmp/autopkgtest-lxc.3ztn5450/downtmp/build.SEG/src/debian/tests/uicheck-sw;
touch /tmp/autopkgtest-lxc.3ztn5450/downtmp/uicheck-sw-stdout
/tmp/autopkgtest-lxc.3ztn5450/downtmp/uicheck-sw-stderr;
/tmp/autopkgtest-lxc.3ztn5450/downtmp/build.SEG/src/debian/tests/uicheck-sw
2> >(tee -a /tmp/autopkgtest-lxc.3ztn5450/downtmp/uicheck-sw-stderr
>&2) > >(tee -a
/tmp/autopkgtest-lxc.3ztn5450/downtmp/uicheck-sw-stdout);" (kind:
test)
autopkgtest [09:25:17]: test uicheck-sw: -----------------------]
autopkgtest [09:25:17]: test uicheck-sw: - - - - - - - - - - results
- - - - - - - - - -
uicheck-sw FAIL timed out
Do you think this is a genuine regression or just a plain timeout?
Reply to: