Bug#725390: marked as done (libreoffice-impress: export fails to process more than 1 page)
Your message dated Mon, 5 Nov 2018 00:59:25 +0100
with message-id <246cfcdd-2527-c521-d86d-4fe271093ad3@free.fr>
and subject line libreoffice-impress: export fails to process more than 1 page
has caused the Debian Bug report #725390,
regarding libreoffice-impress: export fails to process more than 1 page
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)
--
725390: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=725390
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
- To: Debian Bug Tracking System <submit@bugs.debian.org>
- Subject: export fails to process more than 1 page
- From: Scott <westlake2012@videotron.ca>
- Date: Fri, 04 Oct 2013 21:43:21 -0400
- Message-id: <20131005014321.5396.67067.reportbug@debian.localdomain>
Package: libreoffice-impress
Version: 1:3.5.4+dfsg2-0+deb7u2
Severity: normal
Exporting to a png file does not process more than the slide that's selected.
(The 'selection' checkbox is not selected should allow exporting all slides)
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 7.1
APT prefers stable-updates
APT policy: (500, 'stable-updates'), (500, 'stable')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Foreign Architectures: i386
Kernel: Linux 3.9-0.bpo.1-amd64 (SMP w/4 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=en_CA.utf8, LC_CTYPE=en_CA.utf8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
Versions of packages libreoffice-impress depends on:
ii libc6 2.17-7
ii libc6-udeb [libc6] 2.17-92+b1
ii libgcc1 1:4.7.2-5
ii libreoffice-core 1:3.5.4+dfsg2-0+deb7u2
ii libreoffice-draw 1:3.5.4+dfsg2-0+deb7u2
ii libstdc++6 4.7.2-5
ii uno-libs3 3.5.4+dfsg2-0+deb7u2
ii ure 3.5.4+dfsg2-0+deb7u2
libreoffice-impress recommends no packages.
libreoffice-impress suggests no packages.
Versions of packages libreoffice-core depends on:
ii fontconfig 2.9.0-7.1
ii fonts-opensymbol 2:102.2+LibO3.5.4+dfsg2-0+deb7u2
ii libc6 2.17-7
ii libc6-udeb [libc6] 2.17-92+b1
ii libcairo2 1.12.2-3
ii libcmis-0.2-0 0.1.0-1+b1
ii libcurl3-gnutls 7.26.0-1+wheezy3
ii libdb5.1 5.1.29-5
ii libexpat1 2.1.0-1
ii libexttextcat0 3.2.0-2
ii libfontconfig1 2.9.0-7.1
ii libfreetype6 2.4.9-1.1
ii libgcc1 1:4.7.2-5
ii libglib2.0-0 2.33.12+really2.32.4-5
ii libgraphite2-2.0.0 1.1.3-1
ii libgstreamer-plugins-base0.10-0 0.10.36-1.1
ii libgstreamer0.10-0 0.10.36-1.2
ii libhunspell-1.3-0 1.3.2-4
ii libhyphen0 2.8.3-2
ii libice6 2:1.0.8-2
ii libicu48 4.8.1.1-12
ii libjpeg8 8d-1
ii libmythes-1.2-0 2:1.2.2-1
ii libneon27-gnutls 0.29.6-3
ii libnspr4 2:4.9.2-1
ii libnspr4-0d 2:4.9.2-1
ii libnss3 2:3.14.3-1
ii libnss3-1d 2:3.14.3-1
ii libpng12-0 1.2.49-1
ii librdf0 1.0.15-1+b1
ii libreoffice-common 1:3.5.4+dfsg2-0+deb7u2
ii librsvg2-2 2.36.1-1
ii libsm6 2:1.2.1-2
ii libssl1.0.0 1.0.1e-2
ii libstdc++6 4.7.2-5
ii libx11-6 2:1.6.1-1
ii libxext6 2:1.3.1-2+deb7u1
ii libxinerama1 2:1.1.2-1+deb7u1
ii libxml2 2.8.0+dfsg1-7+nmu1
ii libxrandr2 2:1.3.2-2+deb7u1
ii libxrender1 1:0.9.7-1+deb7u1
ii libxslt1.1 1.1.26-14.1
ii uno-libs3 3.5.4+dfsg2-0+deb7u2
ii ure 3.5.4+dfsg2-0+deb7u2
ii zlib1g 1:1.2.7.dfsg-13
Versions of packages libreoffice-draw depends on:
ii libc6 2.17-7
ii libc6-udeb [libc6] 2.17-92+b1
ii libgcc1 1:4.7.2-5
ii libreoffice-core 1:3.5.4+dfsg2-0+deb7u2
ii libstdc++6 4.7.2-5
ii libvisio-0.0-0 0.0.17-1
ii libwpd-0.9-9 0.9.4-3
ii libwpg-0.2-2 0.2.1-1
ii libxml2 2.8.0+dfsg1-7+nmu1
ii uno-libs3 3.5.4+dfsg2-0+deb7u2
ii ure 3.5.4+dfsg2-0+deb7u2
ii zlib1g 1:1.2.7.dfsg-13
-- no debconf information
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Hello,
This bug [1] have been forwarded to upstream [2].
If you wish to continue supporting your LO improvement request, please
refer to the upstream report [2].
Thanks for your report.
[1] https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=725390
[3] https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=67614
Regards,
--
Stéphane Aulery
--- End Message ---
Reply to: