[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#763872: marked as done (libreoffice-base: please allow saving a relationship model as a separate file)



Your message dated Mon, 5 Nov 2018 00:33:35 +0100
with message-id <1f728bf6-5f8f-d991-0cd5-31347ace7da1@free.fr>
and subject line libreoffice-base: please allow saving a relationship model as a separate file
has caused the Debian Bug report #763872,
regarding libreoffice-base: please allow saving a relationship model as a separate file
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
763872: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=763872
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: libreoffice-base
Version: 1:3.5.4+dfsg2-0+deb7u2
Severity: wishlist

Dear Maintainer,

the relationship window is a great tool, thank you! There must be some internal format for
reverse-engineered or newly created relationship models. Please consider offering a way of
serialising these models so that they can be reloaded without access to the same database
connection or even with a different database connection open, thus facilitating an
important step in a migration process, e.g. from My SQL to Postgres.

-- System Information:
Debian Release: 7.6
  APT prefers stable-updates
  APT policy: (500, 'stable-updates'), (500, 'stable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)

Kernel: Linux 3.2.0-4-686-pae (SMP w/2 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=en_IE.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_IE.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash

Versions of packages libreoffice-base depends on:
ii  default-jre [java5-runtime]    1:1.6-47
ii  libc6                          2.13-38+deb7u4
ii  libgcc1                        1:4.7.2-5
ii  libhsqldb-java                 1.8.0.10+dfsg-0+deb7u1
ii  libreoffice-base-core          1:3.5.4+dfsg2-0+deb7u2
ii  libreoffice-core               1:3.5.4+dfsg2-0+deb7u2
ii  libreoffice-java-common        1:3.5.4+dfsg2-0+deb7u2
ii  libstdc++6                     4.7.2-5
ii  openjdk-6-jre [java5-runtime]  6b32-1.13.4-1~deb7u1
ii  openjdk-7-jre [java5-runtime]  7u65-2.5.1-5~deb7u1
ii  uno-libs3                      3.5.4+dfsg2-0+deb7u2
ii  ure                            3.5.4+dfsg2-0+deb7u2

libreoffice-base recommends no packages.

Versions of packages libreoffice-base suggests:
pn  libmyodbc | odbc-postgresql | libsqliteodbc | tdsodbc | mdbtools  <none>
ii  libmysql-java                                                     5.1.16-2
ii  libpostgresql-jdbc-java [libpg-java]                              9.1-901-2
pn  libreoffice-gcj                                                   <none>
pn  libreoffice-report-builder                                        <none>
pn  unixodbc                                                          <none>

Versions of packages libreoffice-core depends on:
ii  fontconfig                       2.9.0-7.1
ii  fonts-opensymbol                 2:102.2+LibO3.5.4+dfsg2-0+deb7u2
ii  libc6                            2.13-38+deb7u4
ii  libcairo2                        1.12.2-3
ii  libcmis-0.2-0                    0.1.0-1+b1
ii  libcurl3-gnutls                  7.26.0-1+wheezy10
ii  libdb5.1                         5.1.29-5
ii  libexpat1                        2.1.0-1+deb7u1
ii  libexttextcat0                   3.2.0-2
ii  libfontconfig1                   2.9.0-7.1
ii  libfreetype6                     2.4.9-1.1
ii  libgcc1                          1:4.7.2-5
ii  libglib2.0-0                     2.33.12+really2.32.4-5
ii  libgraphite2-2.0.0               1.1.3-1
ii  libgstreamer-plugins-base0.10-0  0.10.36-1.1
ii  libgstreamer0.10-0               0.10.36-1.2
ii  libhunspell-1.3-0                1.3.2-4
ii  libhyphen0                       2.8.3-2
ii  libice6                          2:1.0.8-2
ii  libicu48                         4.8.1.1-12+deb7u1
ii  libjpeg8                         8d-1+deb7u1
ii  libmythes-1.2-0                  2:1.2.2-1
ii  libneon27-gnutls                 0.29.6-3
ii  libnspr4                         2:4.9.2-1+deb7u2
ii  libnss3                          2:3.14.5-1+deb7u2
ii  libnss3-1d                       2:3.14.5-1+deb7u2
ii  libpng12-0                       1.2.49-1
ii  librdf0                          1.0.15-1+b1
ii  libreoffice-common               1:3.5.4+dfsg2-0+deb7u2
ii  librsvg2-2                       2.36.1-2
ii  libsm6                           2:1.2.1-2
ii  libssl1.0.0                      1.0.1e-2+deb7u12
ii  libstdc++6                       4.7.2-5
ii  libx11-6                         2:1.5.0-1+deb7u1
ii  libxext6                         2:1.3.1-2+deb7u1
ii  libxinerama1                     2:1.1.2-1+deb7u1
ii  libxml2                          2.8.0+dfsg1-7+wheezy1
ii  libxrandr2                       2:1.3.2-2+deb7u1
ii  libxrender1                      1:0.9.7-1+deb7u1
ii  libxslt1.1                       1.1.26-14.1
ii  uno-libs3                        3.5.4+dfsg2-0+deb7u2
ii  ure                              3.5.4+dfsg2-0+deb7u2
ii  zlib1g                           1:1.2.7.dfsg-13

Versions of packages libreoffice-base is related to:
pn  libmyodbc                             <none>
ii  libmysql-java                         5.1.16-2
ii  libpostgresql-jdbc-java [libpg-java]  9.1-901-2
pn  libsapdbc-java                        <none>
pn  libsqliteodbc                         <none>
pn  mdbtools                              <none>
pn  odbc-postgresql                       <none>
pn  tdsodbc                               <none>
pn  unixodbc                              <none>

-- debconf-show failed

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Hello,

This bug [1] have been forwarded to upstream [2].

If you wish to continue supporting your LO improvement request, please refer to the upstream report [2].

Thanks for your report.

[1] https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=763872
[3] https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=98150

Regards,

--
Stéphane Aulery

--- End Message ---

Reply to: