[libreoffice] branch debian-experimental-5.3 updated (1b8dbab -> 5ac39c2)
This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script.
rene pushed a change to branch debian-experimental-5.3
in repository libreoffice.
from 1b8dbab Merge remote-tracking branch 'origin/debian-experimental-5.2' into debian-experimental-5.3
adds 2c111b3 git update; update OPENCL_DLL_NAME.diff
adds ef7ae89 add missing >&3's to the bug scripts
adds 9421ca3 backport patch to allow java update version number > 99
adds d5af988 Merge remote-tracking branch 'origin/master' into debian-experimental-5.1
adds 7beada7 5.2.0 rc3
adds f6fc5a5 Merge remote-tracking branch 'origin/master' into debian-experimental-5.2
adds 22fbdf4 Merge remote-tracking branch 'origin/master' into debian-experimental-5.2
adds 0373ebd 5.2.0 rc4
adds 63f62d2 release 1:5.2.0~rc4-1
adds 650349a Merge branch 'debian-experimental-5.2'
adds 7931d6b 5.2.0 rc4 == final; target unstable
adds 360d163 jre-update-gt-99.diff is not upstream in 5.2.0
adds 034d497 fix build with curl 7.50.0
adds 1e4248e fix merge
adds 0b0c664 5.1.5 rc2
adds ce45ae1 Merge branch 'master' of ssh://git.debian.org/git/pkg-openoffice/libreoffice
adds b00c1be fix changelog trailer...
new 5ac39c2 Merge remote-tracking branch 'origin/master' into debian-experimental-5.3
The 1 revisions listed above as "new" are entirely new to this
repository and will be described in separate emails. The revisions
listed as "adds" were already present in the repository and have only
been added to this reference.
Summary of changes:
changelog | 28 +++++++++++++++++++++++++---
libreoffice-core.bug-script.in | 2 +-
patches/curl-7.50.0.diff | 23 +++++++++++++++++++++++
patches/jre-update-gt-99.diff | 31 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
patches/series | 2 ++
ure.bug-script.in | 2 +-
6 files changed, 83 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
create mode 100644 patches/curl-7.50.0.diff
create mode 100644 patches/jre-update-gt-99.diff
--
Alioth's /usr/local/bin/git-commit-notice on /srv/git.debian.org/git/pkg-openoffice/libreoffice.git
Reply to: