Re: xulrunner-dev is gone
- To: Mike Hommey <mh@glandium.org>
- Cc: gecko-mediaplayer@packages.debian.org, gnash@packages.debian.org, gnome-chemistry-utils@packages.debian.org, icedtea-web@packages.debian.org, libreoffice@packages.debian.org, mozilla-gnome-keyring@packages.debian.org, npapi-vlc@packages.debian.org, openvrml@packages.debian.org, packagekit@packages.debian.org, spice-xpi@packages.debian.org, stylish@packages.debian.org
- Subject: Re: xulrunner-dev is gone
- From: Gabriele Giacone <1o5g4r8o@gmail.com>
- Date: Wed, 11 Jun 2014 19:02:23 +0200
- Message-id: <[🔎] CABcaWC36+BJQ6c+4Wt2Otq3FmRQJhpfWXn3COVfG8A9tQpXh=g@mail.gmail.com>
- In-reply-to: <[🔎] 20140611094132.GA24090@glandium.org>
- References: <[🔎] 20140611024717.GA5412@glandium.org> <[🔎] CABcaWC022USGDos8a5ipAjHBhSvDAzGp-yAbL2oJmTcnfOBzQw@mail.gmail.com> <[🔎] 20140611094132.GA24090@glandium.org>
On Wed, Jun 11, 2014 at 11:41 AM, Mike Hommey <mh@glandium.org> wrote:
> AFAICT, Ubuntu has a firefox-dev package that only contains NPAPI
> headers in /usr/include/firefox. I don't think that would be enough for
> all rdeps we have in Debian. I think some are not NPAPI plugins.
>
> Anyways, I guess most rdeps are just using the mozilla-*.pc files. I'll
> at least add the mozilla-plugin.pc one in next upload (which I'll do
> tomorrow morning, after I confirm only armel is broken). That should
> help most.
>
>> How about linking /u/i/xulrunner -> /u/i/iceweasel-N instead?
Thanks, way cleaner.
>> BTW would packaging npapi-sdk still be a good alternative?
>>
>> https://bugs.debian.org/642168
>
> Definitely, yes.
I've just uploaded it to mentors. Anyone interested in reviewing/sponsoring it?
http://mentors.debian.net/package/npapi-sdk
Packaging at https://github.com/gg0/npapi-sdk
Thanks,
--
G..e
Reply to: