Re: xulrunner-dev is gone
- To: Mike Hommey <mh@glandium.org>
- Cc: gecko-mediaplayer@packages.debian.org, gnash@packages.debian.org, gnome-chemistry-utils@packages.debian.org, icedtea-web@packages.debian.org, libreoffice@packages.debian.org, mozilla-gnome-keyring@packages.debian.org, npapi-vlc@packages.debian.org, openvrml@packages.debian.org, packagekit@packages.debian.org, spice-xpi@packages.debian.org, stylish@packages.debian.org
- Subject: Re: xulrunner-dev is gone
- From: Rene Engelhard <rene@debian.org>
- Date: Wed, 11 Jun 2014 07:25:27 +0200
- Message-id: <[🔎] 20140611052527.GA4984@rene-engelhard.de>
- In-reply-to: <[🔎] 20140611024717.GA5412@glandium.org>
- References: <[🔎] 20140611024717.GA5412@glandium.org>
Hi,
On Wed, Jun 11, 2014 at 11:47:17AM +0900, Mike Hommey wrote:
> I just uploaded iceweasel 30 to unstable, which is the first version not
> to provide xulrunner-dev. Instead, there is an iceweasel-dev package,
> and it most certainly has things missing. Read: I *know* there are
> things missing. I just don't know what specifically reverse build deps
> would need.
Wait. You upload something known-broken to unstable? Why on earth
didn't you ask people to test on experimental first?
> This is where I need your assistance: could you try building your
> packages against iceweasel-dev and see what they are bugging about?
> Please file bugs against iceweasel-dev for anything missing you'd
> encounter.
Will do.
(Maybe not a bad move of LO to remove all NPAPI support.)
> I *will* eventually get to doing the research myself, but it would
> really be helpful if you could beat me to it :)
It would really be helpful not to break unstable like that.
Regards,
Rene
Reply to: