[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#677146: marked as done (python-uno uses unopkg from libreoffice-common in preinst without declaring Pre-Depends)

Your message dated Sat, 3 Nov 2012 09:01:50 +0100
with message-id <20121103080150.GA5754@rene-engelhard.de>
and subject line Re: Bug#677146: python-uno uses unopkg from libreoffice-common in preinst without declaring Pre-Depends
has caused the Debian Bug report #677146,
regarding python-uno uses unopkg from libreoffice-common in preinst without declaring Pre-Depends
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
677146: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=677146
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message --- 
Package: python-uno
Version: 1:3.5.3-5
Severity: serious
Justification: Policy 7.2

during an upgrade, the python-uno preinst script calls:

/usr/lib/libreoffice/program/unopkg

This file seems to come from the libreoffice-core pacakge.  According
to the policy:

    "Pre-Depends are also required if the preinst script depends on
    the named package"

I found this when helping someone that was having trouble upgrading
from squeeze to wheezy and was getting a preinst failure due to this
file being missing.

stew

-- System Information:
Debian Release: wheezy/sid
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)

Kernel: Linux 3.2.0-2-amd64 (SMP w/4 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash

Versions of packages python-uno depends on:
ii  libc6             2.13-32
ii  libgcc1           1:4.7.0-10
ii  libpython2.7      2.7.3~rc2-2.1
ii  libreoffice-core  1:3.5.3-5
ii  libstdc++6        4.7.0-10
ii  python            2.7.2-10
ii  python2.7         2.7.3~rc2-2.1
ii  uno-libs3         3.5.3-5
ii  ure               3.5.3-5

python-uno recommends no packages.

python-uno suggests no packages.

-- no debconf information

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- 
On Sat, Nov 03, 2012 at 01:59:09AM -0400, Michael Gilbert wrote:
> A lot going on in this bug report, but after a cursory look, it seems
> that unstable would still be affected, and being an rc bug, I'm
> reopening to appropriately track it as an unfixed issue there.

And I clearly said that this "bug" is theoretical and that the script
checks whether unopkg was functional before using it.

Which is the normal case for stuff like this.

*Seems* is not something we should do here. Show me a real problem and you can
reopen this bug.

Until  then - closing again.

(And thanks for fixing the "found" again which you removed to your reopen instead
of "found".)

Regards,

Rene

--- End Message ---
Reply to: