[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

[SCM] LibreOffice packaging repository annotated tag, libreoffice_3.5.3_rc2-1, created. libreoffice_3.5.3_rc2-1



The annotated tag, libreoffice_3.5.3_rc2-1 has been created
        at  e6094a0a9a2c471425778bf50b547633c6e484c6 (tag)
   tagging  eb62a2fd8d10d27ff8c5cc14645e7d083582f32c (commit)
  replaces  libreoffice_3.5.3_rc1-1
 tagged by  Rene Engelhard
        on  Thu Apr 26 14:27:30 2012 +0200

- Shortlog ------------------------------------------------------------
tag libreoffice 1:3.5.3~rc2-1
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux)
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=tRQu
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Rene Engelhard (10):
      fix gtk3 build with gcc 4.4
      only ship (and build) unowinreg.dll for i386/amd64
      Merge remote-tracking branch 'origin/master' into debian-experimental-3.5
      update to rc2
      regen control
      also use gcc 4.4 on mips
      also set HOME to $INSTDIR for unopkg (as -env=UserInstallation does not work (anymore)
      fix typo to actually try to rm -rf /var/lib/libreoffice/share/prereg
      readd move of libdbalo.so to -base-core
      release libreoffice 1:3.5.3~rc2-1

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

-- 
LibreOffice packaging repository


Reply to: