[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#669065: openoffice.org-impress: OpenOffice.org Impress still shown as default application in context menu after removal and installation of LibreOffice



Package: openoffice.org-impress
Version: 1:3.2.1-11+squeeze2
Severity: minor

Dear Debian folks,


after an upgrade to LibreOffice and removal of OpenOffice.org right
clicking on a ppt file in the GNOME’s file viewer Nautilus
OpenOffice.org Impress is still shown as the default application. This
entry should not be there after an removal.

openoffice.org-impress is still marked as `rc` when listed by `dpkg`.
But I cannot display the left over config files using `dpkg -L`.

So there are several possible causes for this problem.

1. Some config file needs to be purged. If so, a note should be added to
`README.Debian.gz` that OO.org’s config files are not important(?) and
were migrated to LibreOffice and therefore OO.org packages can be safely
purged.

2. It is related to GNOME(?) and shared-mime-utils that it is listed
there somehow.

3. Maybe I explicitly set OO.org Impress as the default application for
ppt files in the past. So GNOME should cope with that situation more
cleverly and forget such a choice after application removal.


Thanks,

Paul

-- System Information:
Debian Release: wheezy/sid
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing'), (500, 'stable'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: i386 (x86_64)

Kernel: Linux 3.2.0-2-amd64 (SMP w/2 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=de_DE.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=de_DE.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash

Versions of packages openoffice.org-impress depends on:
ii  libc6                2.13-27
ii  libgcc1              1:4.7.0-3
ii  libstdc++6           4.7.0-3
ii  libstlport4.6ldbl    4.6.2-7
ii  openoffice.org-core  <none>
ii  openoffice.org-draw  <none>
ii  ure                  3.5.2-3

openoffice.org-impress recommends no packages.

openoffice.org-impress suggests no packages.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part


Reply to: