[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#653677: marked as done (libreoffice-core: libreoffice is depending on kde (libkdeui5 and libkio5)Hello, I wanted to test the version of LO in experimental. lo-core is depending on: )

Your message dated Wed, 4 Apr 2012 16:54:09 +0200
with message-id <20120404145409.GB17851@rene-engelhard.de>
and subject line fixed since 1:3.5.0~beta2-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #653677,
regarding libreoffice-core: libreoffice is depending on kde (libkdeui5 and libkio5)Hello, I wanted to test the version of LO in experimental. lo-core is depending on: 
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
653677: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=653677
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message --- 
Package: libreoffice-core
Version: 1:3.5.0~beta2-1
Severity: normal

+ libkdecore5 (>= 4:4.3.4)
+ libkdeui5 (>= 4:4.3.4)
+ libkio5 (>= 4:4.3.4)
+ libqtcore4 (>= 4:4.5.3)
+ libqtgui4 (>= 4:4.5.3)


In the past LO has never needed to pull in KDE...



-- Package-specific info:
All deployed shared extensions:

<none>
All deployed user extensions:

<none>

-- System Information:
Debian Release: wheezy/sid
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (990, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)

Kernel: Linux 3.2.0-rc3+ (SMP w/6 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash

Versions of packages libreoffice-common depends on:
ii  libreoffice-style-galaxy [libreoffice-style-default]  1:3.4.4-2
ii  ure                                                   3.4.4-2+b1

Versions of packages libreoffice-common recommends:
ii  libtextcat-data  2.2-10
ii  xfonts-mathml    4

Versions of packages libreoffice-common suggests:
pn  libreoffice-style-crystal     <none>
pn  libreoffice-style-hicontrast  <none>
pn  libreoffice-style-oxygen      <none>
pn  libreoffice-style-tango       <none>

Versions of packages libreoffice-java-common depends on:
ii  libjaxp1.3-java     1.3.05-2
ii  libreoffice-common  1:3.4.4-2
ii  libxalan2-java      2.7.1-7
ii  libxerces2-java     2.11.0-4

Versions of packages ttf-opensymbol depends on:
ii  fonts-opensymbol  2:2.4.3+LibO3.4.4-2

Versions of packages libreoffice-core is related to:
ii  fglrx-driver                  <none>
ii  firefox                       <none>
ii  iceape-browser                <none>
ii  icedove                       8.0-1
ii  iceweasel                     10.0~b1-2
ii  imagemagick                   8:6.6.9.7-5+b2
ii  libreoffice-filter-binfilter  <none>
ii  libsane                       1.0.22-7
ii  libxinerama1                  2:1.1.1-3
ii  libxrender1                   1:0.9.6-2
ii  nvidia-glx                    <none>
ii  nvidia-glx-legacy             <none>
ii  pstoedit                      3.60-1

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- 
Version: 1:3.5.0~beta2-2

Hmm. Must have either overseen this or it never ended up in my mailbox
(classified as spam or somesuch).

Anyway, yes, that was a bug. Fixed since 1:3.5.0~beta2-2. Closing :)

Regards,

Rene

--- End Message ---
Reply to: