[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#666523: libreoffice: upgrade to 1:3.5.2~rc2-1 utterly fails



Hi,

On Sat, Mar 31, 2012 at 08:43:23PM +0200, Mario 'BitKoenig' Holbe wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 31, 2012 at 07:24:53PM +0200, Rene Engelhard wrote:
> > On Sat, Mar 31, 2012 at 07:10:17PM +0200, Christoph Anton Mitterer wrote:
> > > I deleted some log file manually and then the upgrade of all packages
> > > worked (after three iterations or so); however, still with endless
> > > errors, that a stylesheet cannot be parsed.
> > Yes, noticed that too. (see below)
> > 
> > > ERROR: unopkg cannot be started. The lock file indicates it as already running. If this does not apply, delete the lock file at:
> > > /var/lib/libreoffice/share/prereg/.lock
> > > dpkg: error processing /var/cache/apt/archives/libreoffice-wiki-publisher_1.1.1+LibO3.5.2~rc2-1_all.deb (--unpack):
> > >  subprocess new pre-installation script returned error exit status 1
> > 
> > Do as it says. It doesn't say that for no reason. The unopkg in your first attempt failed
> > and that kept the .lock it seems.
> > 
> > I don't think rm'ing that lock is good (even though one could check for soffice.bin|unopkg.bin not there and the
> > .lock there, but...)
> 
> aptitude safe-upgrade fails the same. terminal-capture attached.

omg. safe-upgrade.. on sid...

> The /var/lib/libreoffice/share/prereg/.lock does not exist prior the
> (initial) upgrade but does afterwards.

Of course. unopkg failed and left that lockfile there :/
 
> rm'ing /var/lib/libreoffice/share/prereg/.lock and a subsequent aptitude
> safe-upgrade succeeds ... well, to some extent: with lots of those
> already mentioned xsltParseStylesheetFile errors:

OK, so it at least doesn't have anything to do with safe-upgrade itself...

> I personally think a bug that breaks an upgrade on... well, a noticeable
> amount of systems should be kept at a prio that shows it up in
> apt-listbugs - as it does now, which probably saves some users some
> trouble. I personally don't really care whether it's grave or serious,
> but I assume there are enough people out there engaged enough to discuss
> that in detail :)

There's a difference between "upgrade impossible, breaks and LibreOffice broken"
and "help stylesheets have problems for -wiki-publisher"...
The first one obviously is serious, the second one isn't, and the latter one doesn't
break the upgrade.

Regards,

Rene



Reply to: