Re: Packaging Apache OpenOffice
Hi,
On Fri, Mar 16, 2012 at 12:40:53AM +0800, imacat wrote:
> On 2012/03/15 21:28, imacat said:
> > On 2012/03/15 21:02, Rene Engelhard said:
> >> On Thu, Mar 15, 2012 at 08:42:28PM +0800, imacat wrote:
> >>> my words seriously. There is no Debian policy that people have to
> >>> submit their real name in order to be taken seriously. What changed you?
> >> Wrong. Maintainer fields have to have real names. And as you wanted
> >> to package and "submit" it as I read from your initial post.
> > Thank you very much to remind me on something I already know. But
> > I'm requesting, not signing or submitting now. You may request me when
> > it is legally needed. Else it is irrelevant.
>
> By the way, to be noted, I said I want to help packaging
> OpenOffice.org two years ago when we first talked. You never required
> that I must use a real name for discussion. You didn't even ask my real
> name then.
I remember now. Sorry, can't remember any(thing|one).
> http://old.nabble.com/Hello-%28and-Problem-with-bzr%29-td28587378.html
Yeah.
> The Debian policy did not change on this part in the past two years.
> Admit it. This is *discrimination*, and here is the prove.
No, it was just not the right time for that. You were in the beginning.
You were just asking on how to checkout the bzr.
When I gave you commit access alioth would have asked you anyway.
(And I'd have asked you for your real name for changelog stuff anyways.)
Maybe I should have - in a more polite tone - then already.
Regards,
Rene
Reply to: