Re: Packaging Apache OpenOffice
Hi,
On Thu, Mar 15, 2012 at 10:34:21PM +0800, imacat wrote:
> As the originator of this discussion thread, did I or anyone mention
> EducOO/OOo4Kids? *YOU* did.
Eric did in the thread on apache.
> * You were *ACCUSING* this thread for simple *LIES*.
Where did I lie? And no, I was not accuding *THIS* thread but the
one *AT APACHE*. But see last point below.
> * You were making fun of my name.
Yes, and if you feel better I apologize but still, you should use
your real name to we can take anything you "submit" as package seriously.
> * You said "The OpenOffice(.org) time in Debian is past. Live with it."
> on the debian-openoffice@ list when I talked about OpenOffice.
And I stand to that.
> And you show no signs of apology for any of the above. Only
> excuses. And who are you? The list maintainer of the Debian OpenOffice
I don't see *any* need to applogize for the latter. And I didn't lie.
> Cc. to Joerg. Sorry, but I do not know of any other way to submit
> this issue to the Debian board. Please someone explain *The Debian Way*
> to me.
Aha. No comment. At least now you have lost any credibility when you
go to the DAM for
- me pointing out the technical problems and that AOO won't be able to
meet debian policy
- insisting you should use a real name
- having a misunderstanding on what eric b meant on the apache list (which
he thankfully made clear. no issue there anymore)
Regards,
Rene
Reply to: