Re: RFS: myspell-sv (updated package)
Hi Agustin!
After some research i found that openoffice.org-dictionaries includes all the files neccesary for the hunspell-sv package, but it does not build it. I patched it to build it and managed to get a working hunspell-sv package out of it. Would this not be the easiest way to create the package? If so, how can i get my patch into the package?
Best regards Jon Lachmann
----- Original Message -----
From: Agustin Martin
[mailto:agmartin@debian.org]
To: Jon Lachmann [mailto:jon@lachmann.nu],
debian-openoffice@lists.debian.org
Sent: Fri, 17 Jun 2011 13:00:12
+0200
Subject: Re: RFS: myspell-sv (updated package)
> On Fri, Jun 17, 2011 at 12:14:17PM +0200, Jon Lachmann wrote:
> > Hi again Agustin!
> >
> > Thank you for your new reply, if i build the package based of off
> > hunspell-en-us and get it uploaded, is there a way to make sure the
> > ancient myspell package gets removed in favor of the new hunspell
> > one? (That is, in a fresh install, so the user doesnt have to
> > download it himself)
>
> I was convinced that entries in hunspell-sv control file like:
>
> Provides: myspell-sv
> Conflicts: myspell-sv
> Replaces: myspell-sv
>
> should have done the trick.
>
> However, I recently make some NMU using this for a couple of
> renamimgs in myspell-hr (openoffice.org-hyphenation-hr->hyphen-hr)
> and openoffice.org-en-au (openoffice.org-thesaurus-en-au->mythes-en-au)
> and noticed that this was not happening as I expected.
>
> Just noticed that using a transitional package as described in
>
> http://wiki.debian.org/Renaming_a_Package
>
> may help.
>
> Rene, do you know of a better way? Otherwise I will prepare a couple of new
> NMUs using transitional package to smooth package renamings under myspell-hr
> and openoffice.org-en-au.
>
> > I will start to create the hunspell-sv package as soon as possible. Any
> > concerns, tips?
>
> Please look at
>
> http://dict-common.alioth.debian.org/dsdt-policy.html
>
> or at a more recent version under /usr/share/doc/dictionaries-common-dev
> for some generic guidelines.
>
> Regards,
>
> --
> Agustin
>
Reply to: