[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#582785: marked as forwarded (openoffice.org-calc: OOo Calc is extremely slow when saving a document with many hidden lines)



Your message dated Tue, 25 May 2010 17:27:30 +0200
with message-id <20100525152730.GH26172@rene-engelhard.de>
has caused the   report #582785,
regarding openoffice.org-calc: OOo Calc is extremely slow when saving a document with many hidden lines
to be marked as having been forwarded to the upstream software
author(s) Kohei Yoshida <kyoshida@novell.com>

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
582785: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=582785
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Hi,

On Tue, May 25, 2010 at 04:33:02PM +0200, ghe.bugreports@gmail.com wrote:
>>> Open a new document, hide lines 11-1048576[...]
>>
>> What sense does that make?
>>
>
> It doesn't make any sense, that's why I took the time to submit a  
> bugreport.

Ah, because hiding lines 11-1048576 doesn't make sense (that's what I
asked) you file a bugreport?

> with the provious version installed on my computer (3.1.1-15+squeeze1).  
> I just upgraded to version 3.2.0-9, and it still has the problem.  I also 

OK, that's a important info.

> installed the "official" 3.2.0, but the problem can't be reproduced, 
> since sheets have at most 65K rows (which is perhaps also why the problem 
> doesn't show up in OS X). 

Jup. That's what I meant with apples and pies.

Kohei, any idea? Seems to be related to the increased row limit...

Grüße/Regards,

René
-- 
 .''`.  René Engelhard -- Debian GNU/Linux Developer
 : :' : http://www.debian.org | http://people.debian.org/~rene/
 `. `'  rene@debian.org | GnuPG-Key ID: D03E3E70
   `-   Fingerprint: E12D EA46 7506 70CF A960 801D 0AA0 4571 D03E 3E70


--- End Message ---

Reply to: