[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#568017: [INTL:sv] Swedish strings for openoffice.org debconf



Hi,

On Tue, Feb 02, 2010 at 01:31:22AM +0100, Martin Bagge wrote:
> On Tue, 2 Feb 2010, Rene Engelhard wrote:
>
>> Try to maintain a package big as OOo which has loads of bogus bugs. You'll
>> soon be swamped under them and don't get them under control.
>
> I really have no need or interest to do pacakge maintaing. I am glad that 
> others do that. I do  my translation work instead and tries to be a  
> friendly sport about that. I can see that me submitting three strings for 

That's OK.

> openoffice.org doesn't look like an effort or anything that really needs 
> a system to be dealt with. And it would need that if it was just that one 

No, actually translation is important too and can be much work, too.

> as I told before I think oo.o is among the packages that needs proper  
> translations. Unfortunatley you gave me a uncalled for correction to a  

Why did you then try want to make your updated sv.po NOT applied?

> because I do not need that treatment. But as you implied, my sense is not 
> in the qality of the package - you are right, my sense for the work is in 
> the quality of my own strings and my own contributions. if you want to 

Good. The accusantion mainly was that you wanted me to NOT include sv.po,
which would be harm *to the translation*.

> shit face me that's up to you but please do not tell me that.

That never was intended, and you know that. You started flaming; I just
pointed you to your error.

Grüße/Regards,

René
-- 
 .''`.  René Engelhard -- Debian GNU/Linux Developer
 : :' : http://www.debian.org | http://people.debian.org/~rene/
 `. `'  rene@debian.org | GnuPG-Key ID: D03E3E70
   `-   Fingerprint: E12D EA46 7506 70CF A960 801D 0AA0 4571 D03E 3E70



Reply to: