[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#522712: openoffice.org-emailmerge: No module named pythonloader



Package: openoffice.org-emailmerge
Version: 1:3.1.0~rc1-1
Severity: minor


Setting up openoffice.org-emailmerge (1:3.1.0~rc1-1) ...                                                                             
Adding extension /usr/lib/openoffice/basis3.1/program/mailmerge.py...                                                                
ERROR: python-loader:<type 'exceptions.ImportError'>: No module named pythonloader, traceback follows                                
no traceback available                                                                                                               

unopkg failed.
 done.

-- Package-specific info:

-- System Information:
Debian Release: squeeze/sid
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)

Kernel: Linux 2.6.26-1-openvz-amd64 (SMP w/2 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash

Versions of packages openoffice.org-emailmerge depends on:
ii  python-uno                 1:3.1.0~rc1-1 full-featured office productivity 

openoffice.org-emailmerge recommends no packages.

openoffice.org-emailmerge suggests no packages.

Versions of packages python-uno depends on:
ii  libc6               2.9-6                GNU C Library: Shared libraries
ii  libgcc1             1:4.4-20090317-1     GCC support library
ii  libstdc++6          4.4-20090317-1       The GNU Standard C++ Library v3
ii  openoffice.org-core 1:3.1.0~rc1-1        full-featured office productivity 
ii  python              2.5.4-2              An interactive high-level object-o
ii  python-central      0.6.11               register and build utility for Pyt
ii  python2.5           2.5.4-1              An interactive high-level object-o
ii  ure                 1.5.0+OOo3.1.0~rc1-1 OpenOffice.org UNO runtime environ

-- no debconf information



Reply to: