[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#545128: (no subject)



hi,

On Sat, Sep 05, 2009 at 12:14:34PM +0200, Rene Engelhard wrote:
> Those sites are not relevant for the package contents, which of course
> *DOES* have a changelog

See here:

diff -u openoffice.org-2.4.1+dfsg/debian/changelog openoffice.org-2.4.1+dfsg/debian/changelog
--- openoffice.org-2.4.1+dfsg/debian/changelog
+++ openoffice.org-2.4.1+dfsg/debian/changelog
@@ -1,3 +1,25 @@
+openoffice.org (1:2.4.1+dfsg-1+lenny3) stable-security; urgency=high
+
+  * rebuild to get correct $LANGPACKISOS in e.g. broffice.org... 
+
+ -- Rene Engelhard <rene@debian.org>  Sun, 21 Jun 2009 01:12:03 +0200
+
+openoffice.org (1:2.4.1+dfsg-1+lenny2) stable-security; urgency=high
+
+  * patches/src680/wmf-pattern-brush.diff: backport fix from
+    ooo-build-3-0-1 branch fixing similar issues like CVE-2008-2237
+    in that patch
+
+ -- Rene Engelhard <rene@debian.org>  Tue, 16 Jun 2009 00:00:10 +0200
+
+openoffice.org (1:2.4.1+dfsg-1+lenny1) stable-security; urgency=high
+
+  * patches/src680/sw.safe_tdelete_tinsert.diff: fix CVE-2009-0200
+    (OpenOffice.org Word Document sprmTDelete Integer Underflow) and
+    CVE-2009-0201 (OpenOffice.org Word Document sprmTInsert Buffer Overflow)
+
+ -- Rene Engelhard <rene@debian.org>  Fri, 22 May 2009 10:30:16 +0200
+
 openoffice.org (1:2.4.1+dfsg-1) stable; urgency=low
 
   * repackage .orig.tar.gz without rfc1345.txt in liblayout.zip

And next time, if you send a bug, please do with proper Subject, as that is
what the BTS uses. Subject: in the mail body does not make sense, iit's the
normal Subject: field the BTS uses. (And that's what the BTS' docs mean)

Grüße/Regards,

Rene



Reply to: