Your message dated Wed, 2 Sep 2009 03:46:17 +0200 with message-id <20090902014617.GA10752@rene-engelhard.de> has caused the report #470397, regarding writer2latex: w2l fails with gij when no absolute path specified to be marked as having been forwarded to the upstream software author(s) writer2latex@gmail.com (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 470397: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=470397 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
- To: writer2latex@gmail.com
- Cc: 470397-forwarded@bugs.debian.org
- Subject: Debian Bug #470397
- From: Rene Engelhard <rene@debian.org>
- Date: Wed, 2 Sep 2009 03:46:17 +0200
- Message-id: <20090902014617.GA10752@rene-engelhard.de>
Hi Henrik, I just noticed I never forwarded #470397 to you - my bad. here is the mail ;-( You can read the full story in http://bugs.debian.org/470397, basically w2l a.tex b.tex fails with gij while w2l /path/to/a.tex /patch/to/b.tex works. On Sun JDK (and probably also OpenJDK) both variant works. Can you have a look? w2l bug? gij bug? w2l having some assumptions not true in gij? Grüße/Regards, Rene
--- End Message ---