Bug#527910: [paket openoffice.org-base] Application does not start
{ why are you deleteing the Cc to that your conversation does not end up in
the buglog. it should }
Hi,
Chris Hildebrandt wrote:
> See above - thanks again.
> >> The application does not start with soffice -base or ooffice -base,
> >> also acessing it from inside writer leads to crash - both without eny
> >> error message. This problem was not present with all older versions in
> >> Sid and Experimental.
> >>
> >
> > Just that there was no change at all in Base's code between rc2 and final
> > and rc2 *was* in experimental.
> >
> >
> I have used the RC2 from Experimental before without any problems. I
> know that the code did not change, that's why I posted the bug here,
> it's probably packaging related.
The packaging didn't change much either, except moving some CLASSPATH settings
from jvmfwk3rc to the new config file for this - as it work here I do not
believe at all that this can be the cause:
(But if you want to try,
/usr/lib/openoffice/basis3.1/share/registry/data/org/openoffice/Office/DataAccess.xcu,
but I removed those packages it references, and Base still works. So that really can't cause
it)
> If you feel a no comment is in place here, the sources are not related to the problem as far as I can see
Every external source can bring problems. Especially if it has different packages than Debian.
> I thought that bug reports from people using Debian Sid are appreciated, but this was probably a misunderstanding.
Correct. Debian sid. Your sources are not Debian sid, it's a mixture of a loads
of different stuff.
> > So you use Sun Java 6. Installed it and tried (I don't have non-free
> > crap installed and just have java-gcj-compat and openjdk-6-jre here,
> > with both it works)
> >
> I can reproduce the problem with openjdk-6-jre, that's what I actually
> used before. I afterwards tried with sun's "crap" with same result,
> which motivated me to file this bug report.
I can't with neither.
> Same bug from several other Debian Sid users. All of them confirm the
> same. By the way, there is a process left open afterwards always:
Then that report would have been earlier, wouldn't there? 3.1.0 is in
sid since Thursday. And a person from the OOo project regularily using
Base and sid didn't yet complain either.
> $ ps axu | grep soffice | grep -v grep
> slam 13616 2.2 1.5 430240 49376 ? Sl 17:51 0:00
> /usr/lib/openoffice/program/soffice.bin -base -splash-pipe=6
>
> I also tried on a "sane" new install via testing netinstall iso with
> same result.
But then it's not a 100% sane system, because you mix testing and unstable ,
but admittedly much more saner than the other mix :)
> I hope this helps you to track the problem down.
I don't believe so.
Grüße/Regards,
René
--
.''`. René Engelhard -- Debian GNU/Linux Developer
: :' : http://www.debian.org | http://people.debian.org/~rene/
`. `' rene@debian.org | GnuPG-Key ID: 248AEB73
`- Fingerprint: 41FA F208 28D4 7CA5 19BB 7AD9 F859 90B0 248A EB73
Reply to: