Dear René,
Am Freitag, den 08.05.2009, 10:13 +0200 schrieb Rene Engelhard:
> Paul Menzel wrote:
> > upgrading to openoffice.org 3.1.0-1 today openoffice.org-writer2latex{u}
> > was removed. The following error was displayed.
>
> Well, you can keep it if you want. I bet you use aptitude and it just
> removes it again because it got installed automatically because the
> "openoffice.org" metapackage depending on it - which it doesn't do anymore :)
Sorry, I was not clear. I am fine with the removal of the packages.
> > Entferne openoffice.org-writer2latex ...
> >
> > ERROR: There is no such extension deployed: org.openoffice.da.writer2latex.oxt
> >
> > unopkg failed.
> > Removing extension org.openoffice.da.writer2latex.oxt...
> > ERROR: There is no such extension deployed: org.openoffice.da.writer2latex.oxt
> >
> > unopkg failed.
> > done.
>
> So obviously your install was broken before because
> org.openoffice.da.writer2latex.oxt *IS* there before the upgrade.
>
> on normal squeeze (or sid, fwiw):
>
> # apt-get install openoffice.org
> [...]
> Setting up openoffice.org-writer2latex (0.5.0.2-4) ...
> Adding extension /usr/lib/openoffice/share/extension/install/writer2latex.oxt... done.
> [...]
> # /usr/lib/openoffice/program/unopkg list --shared
> all deployed shared packages:
> Identifier: org.openoffice.da.writer2latex.oxt
> Version: 0.5.0.2
>
> The prerm assumes that if you have the package installed you have the extension
> registered - if not anything else was broken before that.
> Please don't make package maintainers responsible for working around broken
> systems before the upgrade.
> Just checking for it being there and removing it only when it's not shown
> in --list can open other can of worms, better fail early.
I only used aptitude and the Sid repository for unstable and did not
tinker with the packages. (At least as far as I know. But I am pretty
sure.)
> In neither way is this is a bug in writer2latex - (well, it might be one in the global scope but you didn't paste the full upgrade log but just this which is
> not exactly useful).
There were no other warnings or error messages.
Sorry, I just saw the ERROR message and filed a bug report. If you say,
it is no bug, feel free to close it.
Bests,
Paul
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Dies ist ein digital signierter Nachrichtenteil