Rene Engelhard wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Michael Biebl wrote:
>>>> libgcj-common 1:4.3.2-2 [13,7kB]
>>>> gcj-4.3-base 4.3.2-2 [103kB]
>>>> libgcj9-0 4.3.2-2 [10,4MB]
>>>> libgcj-bc 4.3.2-2 [1132B]
>>>> java-common 0.30 [77,0kB]
>>>> gij-4.3 4.3.2-2 [50,0kB]
>>>> fastjar 2:0.95-4 [46,5kB]
>>>> libgcj9-jar 4.3.2-2 [10,1MB]
>>>> gij 4:4.3.2-2 [1442B]
>>>> liblog4j1.2-java 1.2.15-4 [313kB]
>>>> libregexp-java 1.4-5 [89,7kB]
>>>> libbcel-java 5.2-3 [483kB]
>>>> libmx4j-java 3.0.2-4 [905kB]
>>>> java-gcj-compat-headless 1.0.78-2 [107kB]
>>>> libgcj9-0-awt 4.3.2-2 [81,8kB]
>>>> java-gcj-compat 1.0.78-2 [1026B]
>>>> libjaxp1.3-java 1.3.04-3 [180kB]
>>>> libxerces2-java 2.9.1-2 [1127kB]
>>>> libjaxp1.3-java-gcj 1.3.04-3 [161kB]
>>>> libxerces2-java-gcj 2.9.1-2 [1551kB]
>>>> libxalan2-java 2.7.1-2 [3423kB]
>>>> libxalan2-java-gcj 2.7.1-2 [3464kB]
>>>> libservlet2.4-java 5.0.30-8 [958kB]
>>> If you installed etchs "openoffice.org" pmetapackage you slready should
>>> have most of them. So they are just upgraded.
>>
>> I haven't installed any java package by hand!
>
> But the etch install did.
> - gcj-4.1-base
> - gij-4.1
> - gij
> - libgcj-bc
> - libgcj-common
> - libgcj7-0
> - libgcj7-awt
> - libgcj7-jar
> - libhsqldb-java
> - libjaxp1.3-java
> - libjline-java
> - libservlet2.3-java
> - libxalan2-java
> - libxerces2-java
> - libxt-java
> The openoffice.org metapackage depends on
> a) openoffice.org-base. Uses hsqldb as database engine so depends
> on libhsqldb-java + JVM
> b) openoffice.org-java-common. Takes xalan, xerces etc into the system.
>
> So the stuff you see above is just an upgrade (and the
> install of java-gcj-compat) NOT a install of additional Java stuff..
>
> Same with the -gcj packages, openoffice.org-gcj is in the desktop task.
>
>> As I said, I installed a fresh etch system with the gnome desktop task, and
>> after the lenny update, I got all the above java packages.
>
> Just because you had them before.
Doesn't really matter that much to me:
What I see after the lenny installation/upgrade is, that I have a whole lot of
java packages because of OO.o. O lot of them don't seem to be necessary.
This looks a lot like misplaced Recommends somewhere in the dependency chain.
>> Huh, in what way? Again, I haven't installed a single java package manually.
>> All the above packages have been pulled via dependenices of OO.o.
>
> Or via the desktop task - so you already have them in etch (although
> with a lower version like with the g{c,i}j[,-* ones}
>
>> If you need more information, please let me know.
>
> I think I already have enough information to close this bug. This is
> not a case of packages installed in addition (except the gcj packages itseld)
Why close? I still have this awfully long list of java dependencies.
If it's not OO.o fault, then please reassign, but do not simply close them.
Michael
--
Why is it that all of the instruments seeking intelligent life in the
universe are pointed away from Earth?
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature