Re: Go-oo logo (splash screen)
Rene Engelhard wrote:
> Rene Engelhard wrote:
>> Renato S. Yamane wrote:
>>> We are using go-oo and not openoffice.org... Maybe is interesting develop
>>> a new logo to Go-oo an use it instead OpenOffice.Org...
>>
>> And? We already express this in the Homepage field and in
>> debian/copyright.
>>
>> No other distro basing on ooo-build does rename their office either.
So... We do only what others distros do? :-(
This is not a good explanation.
We can do what we want... Is not necessary wait RedHat (e.g.) do something,
to we follow it.
>> When
>> you exchange the splash you also need to change %PRODUCTNAME to Go-oo.org,
>> which I DO NOT think makes sense.
We not use OpenOffice.Org package.
OpenOffice.Org don't have solver in calc, don't have OpenXML import filters,
don't have VBA macros compatible, don't have multimedia integration in Linux.
Make sense to you use a OpenOffice.Org name, if we DON'T use it?
> Oh, and rename (almost) all openoffice.org to go-oo.org-*, which I don't
> think is feasible. (and what are you going to do with broffice.org?)
We do only what is easy and feasible? If all developers think as you, Linux
never be developed :-)
If we use go-oo instead OpenOffice.Org, broffice.org is no more necessary.
This metapackage (broffice.org) is necessary in Brazil because openoffice
name is registered here and we can't use it. Go-oo is not registered here, so
we can work with only one package, that is go-oo.
Best regards,
Renato S. Yamane
Reply to: