Hello Rene,
On Fri, Apr 25, 2008 at 07:02:45PM +0200, Rene Engelhard wrote:
> [ you can spare yourself such crappy subjects like you send, if it would
> be adressable it would already have been ]
Ok, sorry for the subject then. It's just annyoing behaviour.
> Helge Kreutzmann wrote:
> > Do you want me to try the fix mentioned in #45 of this bug report or
>
> Well, workaround.
Ok.
> > should I wait for some tests on your side?
>
> There will be no tests on my side. Since the problem is in the user
> config I *cannot* do *anything* onupgrades since I am of course not
> allowed to touch user configs in the maintainer scripts.
Well, but in a part of the user config I've never touched. So somehow
this config was either updated by OO.org itself or ignored previously.
> As I already said to an other guy asking about this: if you want it
> fixed, send a patch which does *NOT* involve fiddling with the user
> config.
I've no idea about the innards of OO.org, I'm a plain user. Maybe
upstream knows what's going on?
I'll keep my config as is for a while, so if a fix appears in the
meantime I can try it, but when this get too annyoing I'll try the
workaround (of course, I can make backup copies if desired to test
later).
Greetings
Helge
--
Dr. Helge Kreutzmann debian@helgefjell.de
Dipl.-Phys. http://www.helgefjell.de/debian.php
64bit GNU powered gpg signed mail preferred
Help keep free software "libre": http://www.ffii.de/
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature