[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#466932: Dependecy problem for ure-dbg



Hi,

Miguelangel Jose Freitas Loreto wrote:
> I just make a backport version of OpenOffice.org (1:2.4.0~rc1-2) for
> Debian etch, the build is good but when I installing the 'ure-dbg'

That contradicts what you said in 466931. Can you please decide?

In any case, why is this important and why did you file this in the
bugtracker? etch-backport is not in the scope of this BTS and I'll do
a backport when 2.4 is final.

> package it dos resolve the dependenci whit the 'ure' packages because
> differ version.

works for me on sid.

rene@frodo:~/Debian/Pakete/OpenOffice.org$ dpkg --info ure-dbg_1.4+OOo2.4.0~rc1-2.3pre_amd64.deb | grep Version
 neues Debian-Paket, Version 2.0.
 Version: 1.4+OOo2.4.0~rc1-2.3pre
rene@frodo:~/Debian/Pakete/OpenOffice.org$ dpkg --info ure-dbg_1.4+OOo2.4.0~rc1-2.3pre_amd64.deb | grep Depends
 Depends: ure (= 1.4+OOo2.4.0~rc1-2.3pre)
rene@frodo:~/Debian/Pakete/OpenOffice.org$ dpkg --info ure_1.4+OOo2.4.0~rc1-2.3pre_amd64.deb | grep Version
 neues Debian-Paket, Version 2.0.
 Version: 1.4+OOo2.4.0~rc1-2.3pre

> Package: ure-dbg
>  Version: 1.4+OOo2.4.0~rc1-2mjflve1
>  Section: devel
>  Priority: extra
>  Architecture: i386
>  Depends: ure (= 1:2.4.0~rc1-2mjflve1)
                   ^

The epoch shouldn't be there. Maybe a behaviour difference between etchs and
sids dpkg? As said above, works for me on sid.

I'll eventually just disable the URE packaging for the etch backport.

Regards,

Rene



Reply to: